this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
184 points (98.9% liked)

News

38636 readers
1570 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Kilmar Abrego Garcia will remain in jail for at least a few more days while attorneys in the federal smuggling case against him spar over whether prosecutors have the ability to prevent Abrego Garcia’s deportation if he is released to await trial.

The Salvadoran national whose mistaken deportation became a flashpoint in the fight over President Donald Trump’s immigration policies has been in jail since he was returned to the U.S. on June 7, facing two counts of human smuggling.

Although a federal Judge has ruled that he has a right to be released and even set specific conditions for his release, his attorneys expressed concern that it would lead to immediate detention by ICE and deportation.

On Sunday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes ruled that Abrego Garcia does not have to remain in jail ahead of that trial. On Wednesday afternoon, she set conditions for his release in preparation to allow him to go. But Abrego Garcia’s impending release has been halted over concerns that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement would take him into custody immediately and possibly try to deport him before he can stand trial.

Holmes expressed doubts about her own power to require anything more than that prosecutors use their best efforts to secure the cooperation of Homeland Security and ICE.

“I have no reservations about my ability to direct the local U.S. Attorney’s office,” the judge said. “I don’t think I have any authority over ICE.”

Holmes did not say when she would file the release order for Abrego Garcia, but it will not happen before Friday afternoon.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"you're honor, we can't let him go because he's a flight risk!"

"Your honor, first..... I just have to say, it's 'your', not 'you're'... okay with that out of the way, Mr Abrego wants to stay in this country. He's not a flight risk. He's fighting to stay. The government is just making shit up."

"You'RE honor, he's a flight risk because if you let him out, we'll deport him!"

fucking hell.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago

"He's a flight risk because WE want to put him on a flight outta here!" - Prosecutor

What is this timeline...

[–] Bonus@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If justice ever does make a return, this government is provoking the world's record of wrongful imprisonment lawsuit payouts. He deserves at least ~~some of~~ Leon's billions in reimbursement for this bullshit.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"I can tell you," my colleague went on, "of a man in Leipzig, a judge. He was not a Nazi, except nominally, but he certainly wasn’t an anti-Nazi. He was just—a judge. In ’42 or ’43, early ’43, I think it was, a Jew was tried before him in a case involving, but only incidentally, relations with an ‘Aryan’ woman. This was ‘race injury,’ something the Party was especially anxious to punish. In the case at bar, however, the judge had the power to convict the man of a ‘nonracial’ offense and send him to an ordinary prison for a very long term, thus saving him from Party ‘processing’ which would have meant concentration camp or, more probably, deportation and death. But the man was innocent of the ‘nonracial’ charge, in the judge’s opinion, and so, as an honorable judge, he acquitted him. Of course, the Party seized the Jew as soon as he left the courtroom."

"And the judge?"

"Yes, the judge. He could not get the case off his conscience—a case, mind you, in which he had acquitted an innocent man. He thought that he should have convicted him and saved him from the Party, but how could he have convicted an innocent man? The thing preyed on him more and more, and he had to talk about it, first to his family, then to his friends, and then to acquaintances. (That’s how I heard about it.) After the ’44 Putsch they arrested him. After that, I don’t know."

-from They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-45 by Milton Mayer.

I guess that I have been waiting for a parallel to this story since Trump's first election.

And here we are.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meanwhile Trump was allowed to be free and run for President after leading an insurrection against the United States government

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, Trump is rich and white. So... /s

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 year ago