this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
546 points (99.6% liked)

pics

29023 readers
361 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 166 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

PAGEOS had a diameter of exactly 100 feet (30.48 m), consisted of a 0.5 mils (12.7 μm) thick mylar plastic film coated with vapour deposited aluminum enclosing a volume of about 524,000 cubic feet (14,800 m3)[8][9] The metal coating both reflected sunlight and protected the satellite from damaging ultraviolet waves. The satellite was launched in a canister, which explosively separated as it was ejected from the rocket. Then, the balloon was inflated through a combination of residual internal air and a mixture of benzoic acid and anthraquinone placed inside, which turned to gas when the satellite was exposed to the heat of the sun.[9] It was the first satellite specifically launched for use in geodetic surveying,[3] or measuring the shape of the earth, by serving as a reflective and photographic tracking target. At the time, it improved on terrestrial triangulations of the globe by about an order of magnitude.[4] The satellite, which carried no instrumentation, broke up between 1975 and 1976.

Wikipedia

This was super interesting to read about. I thought the picture surely had to be CG or AI created at first.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Over five years, 16 groups conducted observations at 45 globally distributed stations, about 3000-4000 km apart from each other.[4][7][12] 12 mobile tracking stations were used, which observed during favorable weather conditions during a few minutes of twilight each evening.[7][why?][clarification needed] BC4 cameras were used to photograph the satellite.[12] Observations were taken when the satellite was visible simultaneously to multiple stations at the same time.[12] This resulted in the fixing of the precise locations of 38 different points around the world.[4] This could be used to help determine the precise locations of the continents relative to each other, and to help determine the precise shape and size of the earth.

that is amazing! so cool

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

And it sounds like it was usable for 9 years. That's impressive for a very thin balloon surrounded by 50,000mph dust particles

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That'd actually very similar to how trig points work! It's a giant orbiting trig point. Someone call the ordnance survey!

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I thought the picture surely had to be CG or AI created at first.

Same... This photo is so surreal, I immediately thought of Simon Stalenhag.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Remember this experience when someone "knows" something is AI because It's "obvious", and don't call me Shirley!

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Big boyo.

Not a smart boyo tho.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 49 points 1 year ago

For those wondering: it was inflatable. So it didn't weigh very much and wasn't very big at launch. It then inflated to this huge size shown here.

[–] houndeyes@toast.ooo 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Just like in that movie, Sphere, with Dustin Hoffman.

[–] Evthestrike@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I read the book! Michael Crichton. Same guy who wrote Jurassic park

[–] addie@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really like the book - I think it's one of his best. Subtle 'unreliable narrator' mind-fuck from beginning to end, nicely written and characterised. The film of it is an abomination, though.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I've not read the book yet but I've seen the movie and it's enjoyable by itself, maybe not a great adaptation, but still it was not terrible

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You know its reflective surface? Well, uh...

I hate to be the one non-scientist that picks this up, guys....

...What worries me is that it's reflecting everything but us.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This looks like such a non-human design that I would have mistaken it for a UFO if I found it in space.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You may want to sit down, because I'm about to rock your world.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Aliens!

I want to believe!

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

"Have you tried everything?"

"Everything, sir, it's completely impregnable."

"We must get inside. For all we know, something may be living or perhaps even dying inside this"

"It appears to be seamless--no way in, no way out."

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Getting Flight of the Navigator vibes.

[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know what it is about the 1960s but I love the vibe of the technology. planes, cars, spaceships tended to have that chrome/bare metal look. i love it

[–] Ushmel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We made better materials to reflect the sun stuff at some point. The chrome does look dank AF though

[–] AlexLost@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flight of the Navigator vibes

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 6 points 1 year ago

I don't leak navigator, you leak.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 22 points 1 year ago

Ohhhhhhhhh, it was a balloon. I knew no spacecraft before or since could lift up something that size in a single trip.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAGEOS

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Haha whoa that looks so sick! It's huge!!!

Apparently it was up there for around a decade before breaking up, with one of the largest fragments finally "deorbiting" in 2016.

[–] scytale@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Almost looks like the Sphere in that movie Sphere.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or the giant ball bearing in Ball Bearing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

But where’s the giant hand holding it and the bearded Dutchman?

As an origami fan I would be very interested to see how they managed to fold this thing up.

[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Where's the photographer in the reflection?

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

If my understanding of physics is correct, they'd have to be slap bang in the centre of the reflected image (assuming a perfect sphere), so somewhere on the framework of the corner of the building.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think standing near the red things in the middle of the reflection. Look at the size of the forklift in the reflection for reference.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The center line of lights in the reflection is higher than the location on the wall, which leads me to believe that the photographer is just above vertical center. * Due to the nature of photographing a sphere horizontally they would have to be exactly centered.

I think they're somewhere around here

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

i noticed that in the OP too and it confused me a bit. then i noticed the dark corner bottom left, which is probably a bit of the wall of the dark room the picture was taken out of. that's why the photographer isn't in the reflection.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of the tear drop scouts in the 3 body problem series

[–] blueamigafan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Without context my first thought was a still from a movie about capturing a UFO

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 1 year ago

'Sphere' and 'Navigator' come to mind...

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 1 year ago
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago

This looks like an HDRI sphere render. :D

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I haven't watched Phantasm in a while

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Photographer is hiding in plain sight. Really. I have no idea how they did this.

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I think they're on the end of the catwalk right above the small building in the corner, which would make sense since they'd have to appear in the middle of the sphere unless the image is cropped. Hard to be sure with this resolution, but I'd bet those few lighter pixels are the person holding the camera.

[–] atlien51@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That’s a giant Christmas globe my guy

load more comments
view more: next ›