this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
697 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

89012 readers
2943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/53250107

Police confirmed they had responded to a report of "criminal mischief involving a robot" on the 1200 block of Filbert Street around 1:16 p.m. on Wednesday. A woman on the scene ignored "multiple commands" to move, they said, resulting in a criminal violation notice for disorderly conduct.

Uber declined to comment.

Marvin, who plans to contest the charge on the grounds of her First Amendment right to protest, has been undeterred by the arrest. She plans to continue blocking Uber Eats robots and chatting with curious passersby who ask what she's doing.

"It allows me to talk to people about what's going on," she said. "It's always very interesting conversations that we have, and I think it's good to have those kinds of conversations in public space."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 439 points 6 days ago (8 children)

What is the charge? Blocking a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?!

[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 164 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Police exist to protect capital, not people.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago (6 children)
[–] esc@piefed.social 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Get your hand off my penis!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 180 points 6 days ago (18 children)

There are Waymos that drive through my workplace all night long. Like literally every 10 minutes. They cause problems all the time, as we have semi tractor-trailers trying to dock, and they'll block their movement and then just sit there waiting. They started putting up cones so they wouldn't pull through but now all the legitimate traffic has to get out and move them around every time they want to come through.

One time I blocked 3 of them in for several hours by trapping them by putting more cones behind them, such that there was no exit. That was fun.

[–] Acid_Burn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Robot cones that block the bots but move out of the way for cars would be fun.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 60 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Narrator: Little did @Acid_Burn know that his innocent comment would kick off The Great Robot War and subsequent collapse of civilization.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 63 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Your company needs to charge Waymo a toll for usage of your premises.

Alternatively, get a button-operated rising-arm barrier. All a driver needs to do is push the button to get in or out. Unless they're an AI that can't get out of the car, anyway.

Edit: Sometimes I a word.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Alternatively, get a button-operated rising-arm barrier. All a driver needs to do is push the button to get in or out. Unless they're an AI that can't get out of the car, anyway.

...and send Waymo the bill for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 52 points 6 days ago (15 children)

If you can block bots online, why can't you block them in the physical world?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 133 points 6 days ago (6 children)

If she was not touching the thing then why didn’t it try and get out of her way? It should not be on the sidewalk in the first place, and should not have right of way.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 152 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's always one of the tricks these companies pull. They take some communally-owned thing that used to have a clear purpose and start using it for their different for-profit use.

Take sidewalks. They're surprisingly expensive to build, but they're built from community tax money so that people walking don't have to walk on the road. Now Uber is using them as a place where they can drive their robots. Are they paying anything? I assume not. Sidewalks have also become a favourite parking spot for rental scooters. Do the scooter companies pay for that? Of course not. Even when they're parked well they reduce the space available for walking, and when they're parked badly they can force pedestrians out into the street.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (16 children)

Ugh the rental scooters. Thankfully I’ve seen this dying down. A more common sight in my city now is parking spaces getting turned into bike rental stations. I’m all for that.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You know.. I'm surprised that no one has.. Done more? I'm surprised hunting these things isn't a trend..

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 75 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 75 points 6 days ago (2 children)

That is the crime she was arrested for? Not yielding to a clanker using the sidewalk? Wow, what a joke.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The police arrest protesters for refusing to move on all the time.

You can fight it in court

[–] Colloidal@programming.dev 15 points 6 days ago (4 children)

You can't stand on a sidewalk? That's criminal mischief? This level of bullshit should make everyone's blood boil.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 76 points 6 days ago

What a badass.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 61 points 6 days ago
[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 59 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think hungry people are going to start stopping these because they have food in them.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 35 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I predict they will begin to arm the robots.

We are closer to skynet every day.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] peacepath@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Has it been set illegal to disobey "multiple commands" of a privately owned robot?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (8 children)

When police say somebody ignored commands, they mean from them. They don't get paid to enforce robot commands.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 55 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"criminal mischief involving a robot"

Sounds like a cool name for an upbeat song by an avant garde electro-jazz group.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] olejellylegs@lemmy.zip 47 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ah see that’s where she went wrong, making a scene standing there.

Just spray paint the sensor and move on with your life. Or tip it over. Or put a cone over the sensor. Then disappear.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago (8 children)

That's not legally protected activity

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Welcome to actual protests

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 26 points 6 days ago

Respectfully, you're missing a key piece.

You're making the point that you can't stand up to oppressive powers like Uber while operating within the law.

Crucially: so is she.

This woman is an academic expert on law and our rights, and what she's doing is exploiting a loophole in Uber's control scheme in public and forcing everyone to watch what happens.

She is creating a problem for Uber while denying them a legally justifiable reason to wield law against her. Which will either demonstrate to more people an action that allows protestors to impose harm on a powerful company while remaining out of reach of their ability to impose punishment, or force them to reveal that their ability to impose punishment isn't actually based on law, it's based on power.

In doing so, she helps analyze the strength of various legal rights that can still be used and unmasks which ones no longer exist.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 56 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Who's the narc who called the cops on her?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 71 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Probably the device itself or it's pilot

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 47 points 6 days ago (9 children)

She was arrested for "disorderly conduct", for just standing there.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Kind_to_Everyone@slrpnk.net 32 points 6 days ago

Act surprised when it's revealed Uber sells the camera feed to flock.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 28 points 6 days ago (32 children)

"I know they're taking the jobs of human delivery workers and so, I have been protesting them whenever I saw them by standing in front of them and preventing them from going forward," Marvin said.

I mean fuck. Do we want people working as delivery drones? Really? The other post in fuckai about this doesn't even mention she's been doing this for month which obscures why she's been arrested.

And climate change is real you know? A small robot takes little energy compared to a full sized car.

Ideally delivery robots should be state owned and accountable to democratic processes. They are a valuable and useful innovation to solve logistic problems. A way to reshape how neighborhoods are build and planned and make them more energy efficient.

This dogmatic opposition to anything AI is really becoming more and more irrational, less and less grounded in facts and rational arguments. AI needs to be regulated. Like China currently does AI regulations best, but we can't even imagine things like that any more because people just accept neoliberalism as the new world order and screaming is the only thing left to do apparently instead of demanding regulations or nationalization of certain AI infrastructure. Maybe this is linked to some kind of anti-democracy propaganda campaign. Divide and conquer, and don't even let talk about regulation enter the public discussion.

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

This is basically the start of the counter to automation. We still tell fables about people who stood againt the devaluation of workers like this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (5 children)

The comments section on that article truly was a ride.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Broke: "Uber should hire real humans, not robots!"

Woke: "Uber is a complete rip-off with a deceptive pricing model that is doing nothing but fueling obesity rates, regardless. Never use it."

load more comments
view more: next ›