this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2026
697 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

89012 readers
2840 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/53250107

Police confirmed they had responded to a report of "criminal mischief involving a robot" on the 1200 block of Filbert Street around 1:16 p.m. on Wednesday. A woman on the scene ignored "multiple commands" to move, they said, resulting in a criminal violation notice for disorderly conduct.

Uber declined to comment.

Marvin, who plans to contest the charge on the grounds of her First Amendment right to protest, has been undeterred by the arrest. She plans to continue blocking Uber Eats robots and chatting with curious passersby who ask what she's doing.

"It allows me to talk to people about what's going on," she said. "It's always very interesting conversations that we have, and I think it's good to have those kinds of conversations in public space."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 152 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's always one of the tricks these companies pull. They take some communally-owned thing that used to have a clear purpose and start using it for their different for-profit use.

Take sidewalks. They're surprisingly expensive to build, but they're built from community tax money so that people walking don't have to walk on the road. Now Uber is using them as a place where they can drive their robots. Are they paying anything? I assume not. Sidewalks have also become a favourite parking spot for rental scooters. Do the scooter companies pay for that? Of course not. Even when they're parked well they reduce the space available for walking, and when they're parked badly they can force pedestrians out into the street.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ugh the rental scooters. Thankfully I’ve seen this dying down. A more common sight in my city now is parking spaces getting turned into bike rental stations. I’m all for that.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ugh, what? The scooters are awesome, and they cut down on car traffic.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No they don’t. They cut down on walking.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Um, no. They cut down on car traffic. Hoooooooly shit you people are unfucking real. I see bitching about car culture on here constantly, but when an urban area has municipal tools for reducing it, you still bitch. God fucking damn.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Oh well that string of profanity really convinced me. Thank you for clearing that up.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The scooters are so much better though? Just park near where you need to go, not where the bike station is. Just take photos of the poorly parked ones and whoever last parked it gets a fine.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago

A proper bike system is better though, my city has a city-run bike system with stations on practically every street corner, so it's much better and just as practical

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago

Yeah the scooters are great, it's the lack of enforcement for proper parking that sucks.

Like they make you take a picture to prove you parked it properly. One time I screwed up and took a picture of only my feet. Nothing happened.

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Better only for the person who drops it right where they arrives at their destination. That is almost never also a sensible place for these things to be. What if everyone just got out do their car the second they were in front of the building they want to go to? That would be so much “better” for them!

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Except you jjust know they are taking audio and visual, and scanning wifi and phone and other freqencies and sending it all back to base, that's the problem.

Throw them all into the river! Why rent everything we used to own anyway?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Even if I had my own, I wouldn't carry it across country for a visit of a few days, but I did rent in such a case more than once.

It's really more about unenforced safety rules, people sometimes drive like crazy and they always do that on the scooters they own, because rental have a speed limit

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rental makes sense for this because not everyone wants to take a scooter back home and charge it

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Not the way it's being done it doesn't make sense. A locally owned place that had rules against spying on everyone, and sweeping electronics, yes. A silicon valley operation whose purpose is as much collecting data as it is rental fees, is not.