Exactly. Put the fucking shopping carts where they belong! But also don't get onto me for riding it into the coral like a bobsled led by imaginary bears.
Autism
This is a community for people with Autism to be themselves. All neurotypes are welcome.
Community:
Values
- Acceptance
- Openness
- Understanding
- Equality
- Reciprocity
- Mutuality
- Love
Rules
- No abusive, derogatory, or offensive post/comments e.g: racism, sexism, religious hatred, homophobia, gatekeeping, trolling.
- Posts do not need be related to autism, off-topic discussions are allowed. This is a safe space where people with autism can feel comfortable discussing whatever they feel like discussing, as long as it does not violate the standing rules.
- Do not request donations.
- Be respectful in discussions.
- Do not post misinformation.
- Mark NSFW content accordingly.
- Do not promote Autism Speaks.
- General Lemmy World rules.
- No bots. Humans only.
Encouraged
- Open acceptance of all autism levels as a respectable neurotype.
- Funny memes.
- Respectful venting.
- Describe posts of pictures/memes using text in the body for our visually impaired users.
- Welcoming and accepting attitudes.
- Questions regarding autism.
- Questions on confusing situations.
- Seeking and sharing support.
- Engagement in our community's values.
- Expressing a difference of opinion without directly insulting another user.
- Please report questionable posts and let the mods deal with it.
.
Helpful Resources
- Are you seeking education, support groups, and more? Take a look at our list of helpful resources.
Is riding carts autism or just being a kid for life? I still do this and DOS was my first OS...
This isn't a neurodivergent thing. It's an intelligent / ethical person thing.
It's also unlikely to apply to all neurodivergent people, so I don't know why it was phrased that way.
Because most autists have a stronger sense of rule and most ADHD of ethics. While some don't. They just didn't want to be exclusionary.
Yeah, I've noticed a real problem on here with that. Claiming neurodivergency for something that some people do and some people don't.
This is a trait that some people have. Some people do it more and some do it less. If it's combined with many other symptoms and it makes it difficult for someone to function in society then it might be grounds for a diagnosis.
I think things like this are also just representative of a general shift in society. There's a lot more education online and elsewhere about the power dynamics in society that might have been ignored or not understood in the past. So this behavior is more prevalent which coincides with an increase in neurodivergency even though those two things aren't actually correlated.
Couldn't agree more. I do not follow arbitrary rules unless compelled to, as long as it doesn't harm anyone or anything. If you want me to do something, there needs to be a logical reason for me to do it
I generally follow the rules unless I have a reason not to. The rationale is that just because I don't see the reason for the rule doesn't mean there isn't one. If everyone ignored every rule they didn't understand the need for the world would be even more of a shit show.
So I stop at the stop sign when no one is around. I know I would only do it when it was safe, but so does everyone who got hit by a car running a stop sign at a blind corner in the middle of the night.
I'm definitely asking about it if it's the least bit inconvenient though.
oh thaaat's why I have a fundamental need to explain the reasons why when detailing a process to someone
And I've found that most people do not care, they just want marching orders. Like, I'm not here to give you orders. This is what the goal is, this is how it's currently done, this is why we do it that way. They want to commit "how it's currently done" to rote memory.
And then the first (and second, and third, etc) time something does not go as planned, they're stopped in their tracks. Context was rejected, preventing understanding, leaving little framework for the unexpected.
So they ask me to tell him how to fix it. Well, I don't know how to fix it. This hasn't happened before. I do not have a step by step committed to memory. But I can probably figure it out if you give me a few minutes. There, should be good now.
"Jeez, I didn't want you to do it for me, why can't you just tell me how to do it?"

Bit thanks for doing that, I tend to ignore rules completely when there's no reason given (or I think the reason is bs).
Hahahaha. That's not "autism". That's just "normal". Right?
…Right?
.....right?
...^right?^
sort of tangential, but this discussion reminds me of a recent conversation. we had a plumbing leak recently so we had to have these water damage mitigation guys come out and check all the floors and drywall and figure out what needs to get replaced, yada yada. and they've all got these things they call "moisture meters" which are little black plastic boxes with a digital display on the front, and you hold it against a surface and it shows a number that somehow indicates how much water is absorbed into the material. so I asked one of these guys "hey, how does that work? like what's it actually measuring?" and he gave a response that sounded in tone like a technical explanation, but the actual information essentially boiled down to "it tells you how much water is in there, and if it's above 20 it's bad." and I'm thinking like, yeah, I got that, I figured that out from hearing you call it a "moisture meter" and watching you use it for ten seconds. is that what you thought I was confused about? obviously I mean like, what quantity does the number represent; what are the units; what physical thing is being measured to generate that number; is it based on a physical property, a thermal property, chemical, electrical; you're using it the same on wood, drywall, carpet, insulation, how does it apparently treat all materials the same when they have different physical properties and absorb, hold, and release water in different ways? it just baffled me that I could have all these questions less than a minute after seeing one for the first time, but this guy who uses one professionally every day only needs to know water>20=bad
Spent a few minutes researching because I was almost sure it was just measuring resistance but that is different depending on materials.
They measure moisture by using a scale of wood equivalent moisture. Basically no matter what you stick it in, the pins measure resistance across the probes and give a number as an equivalent reading for sticking them in wood that is wet. Apparently wood is pretty consistent about resistance regardless ofof what type of wood it is. And since American houses are primarily made of wood, we only care about how wet the wood in a home could be.
How curious is the average person about the inner workings of a phone while using one? Most of the time people just need to know how to use tools, rather than the specifics of how they work.

This has little to do with autism and more with being smart. No, seriously.
From the English Wikipedia, stages of moral development:
- Obedience and punishment orientation (''How can I avoid punishment?'')
- Self-interest orientation (''What's in it for me?'') (''Paying for a benefit'')
- Interpersonal accord and conformity (''Social norms'') (''The good boy/girl attitude'')
- Authority and social-order maintaining orientation (''Law and order morality'')
- Social contract orientation
- Universal ethical principles (''Principled conscience'')
1 and 2 are "Level 1 (Pre-Conventional)" (according to the same article, children and animals have this), 3 and 4 are "Level 2 (Conventional)", 5 and 6 are "Level 3 (Post-Conventional)".
The last one is basically thinking around "what if everyone did that?". Unfortunately, lots of people are at either stage 2 or 4. Sometimes downgrading from 4 to 2 once they become the authority.
If you don't have a good damned reason, then fuck your rule. Do you have any idea how many rules exist simply because it favoured one group or person over others? And now we're stuck living with it? Question all the rules. Many of them are selfish bullshit. Like this new everyone has to use AI, or OSs needing photo ID to function, or why rich people get to avoid prison for their numerous rule breaking crimes, even become president FFS.
Rules need to be wise or they shouldn't be followed and I'm not trusting most ppls opinions of whether they are wise or not.
Relevant story:
I worked in a pharmacy during COVID. Once vaccine supply balanced out to the point we could take walk-ins, we were told by corporate that even if someone was walking in without an appointment, we were to go into the system and make them an appointment for the current date and time. To clarify, this is a separate system than what bills insurance, notifies doctors, documents the vaccine etc. It's just an appointment system.
Dumb rule. Stupid. Did not follow it for weeks because we were busy, y'know, administering vaccines and dispensing medications.
Until I found out why we were supposed to do it...
This was the vaccine that you got one dose of, then a follow up dose ~6 weeks later. When you book an appointment, it automatically schedules the followup appointment and notifies the patient when it's coming up, helping us not get slammed with walk-in appointments and the patient not forget their second dose.
From that point on, I was adamant that appointments be made for every vaccine with multiple doses.
I genuinely thought that was everyone. Who just follows bullshit roles that lack substance or explanation - oh, right.
I have a hard time believing its not everyone because it makes zero sense to me why you wouldnt think through something critically.
Well yeah, there are only two kinds of rules:
- The right way to do things
- Stupid bullshit that serves no purpose
If you can't at least give a basic reasoning for the rule, it's #2
All my teachers in school hated me for this lol
Yea whatever, fuck them. I always hated school because of this. I completely understand teachers' plight and all that stuff. It's hard to manage 60 kids n stuff (we had 60 kids per class in the country I grew up in), but still... Treating children like thoughtless, desireless, subhuman entities is one of the greatest tragedies occurring that society is highly blind to.
I agree with others in this thread, this has more to do with ethics and critical thinking than with nuerodivigence. And that nuerodivergence seems to be getting conflated here with autism, specifically.
It's a sign of intelligence to question the status quo.
And if being intelligent is neurodivergent because the rest of the populace is stupid asf, so be it
The problem is that all the rules contradict each other in one way or another. If you know the reason for the rule, then you know which ones take precedence in each situation. Otherwise, you're just making arbitrary choices on which ones to follow and which to break, and if you can just arbitrarily break a rule with no obvious consequences, then why bother ever following it?
Just fucking teach your children why, if you can't explain the reason, maybe you shouldn't be doing it
IMHO most people are not curious enough to have thought about why a rule exists.
I always want to know why a rule exists. I respect people enough to explain why a rule exists too.
This does lead to awkward situations where the reason why the rule exists is bullshit or worse.
Try to figure out why you would have that be a rule if you don't get it though. There are some rules that you will never get explained why, but if you think from their perspective it can actually become clear of, yes this might be a kind of arbitrary rule in some cases, but it shows that you are capable of figuring out and following arbitrary rules.
Like how, I forget which band it is, puts in their contract that all the brown or green or whatever M&Ms have to be put into a separate bowl, because one time the people did not read or follow the setup instructions and people almost fucking died. They can walk into the dressing room and immediately see if the instructions have been followed based on a bowl of M&Ms
This is not a valid excuse to go into asshole territory. Occasionally, you might not be in a position to understand why things are done a certain way - mostly because of inexperience, or your higher-ups might not have the time to explain the rules to you. Some examples might include regulations or standards.
It's alright to be humble and recognize that you may not understand some things sometimes. That's actually how you learn, and avoid pissing off your colleagues.
The second part, where neurodivergent folks do follow rules and get angry when others don't, is the flip side of the coin where neurotypicals don't follow rules that they consider not really that important. They know the rules, they know why, they just think the consequences aren't that bad, or they don't feel the consequences or pure ego. Why is it pathologised when neurodivergent people don't follow rules, but when neurotypicals do it, its fine. Then neurodivergent people are pathologised for noticing neurotypicals don't follow rules. But when neurotypicals notice neurodivergent folk not following rules, not pathologised.
Sorry for the meaningless rant. I haven't had a coffee yet. Better go fix that. Eta: ok I've just had one sip, but now I've got more for the meaningless rant...
Why is it described as "if neurodivergent don't fully understand a rule" and not "when neurotypicals poor communication skills don't explain rules properly, whole swathes of people fail to follow the rule, because of said communication issue"
So what you are saying is that they operate in logic and reason and that they have a healthily critical relationship with authority?
I’m sorry? Which people are they trying to convince us are the broken ones, again?
The real neurodivergence is the charisma chuds; American was built for them. Dumb con men who’s narcissistic tendencies allow them to sell us all on how they’re actually the best ones and we are the weird ones.
I know it’s just reductive fan fiction but I like to imagine all the emotional disregulation baggage is just the realization of living in a world run by selfish children who would kill just to be popular and be waited on
There's some people who aren't neurodivergent and do the same. Some people just don't want to follow rules they don't understand, which can be pretty annoying
If you can't explain your rule so it makes sense, your rule is shit and you expecting others to follow it are the actual annoying person.
This is massively over-generalized. I'm sure some people on the spectrum do this. I don't talk to a lot of people, I am very reclusive, so I couldn't give you an actual irl baseline from experience, but I'm on the spectrum. I have a job with plenty of rules I don't think make any sense. I have a vested interest in keeping my job, so I follow the rules. One of my coworkers has been in the same job for over a decade, and she is quite proficient at following rules she personally doesn't like or understand. She wouldn't have a job here if she didn't.
Someone on the internet overgeneralizing their experience with neurodiversity based on their own personal experience? Unheard of
So the neurodivergent folk converge on it? This rule of thumb makes no sense to me.
this is why I can never live in Japan. there, the justification for rules is literally "because it's a rule". from preschoolers up to the Prime Freaking Minister!
you'd have you literately pull teeth before you could get to the original cause or thought process behind a rule.
of course there are autistic ppl there. they often get ostracized for sense of justice. literally. "seigikan"(正義感) is often unironically mentioned as a reason why someone is difficult to work with. the society also expects members to forgive illogical behavior by not mentioning "seiron"(正論) aka facts/logic.
at least in some western countries, ppl sometimes have the decency to feel embarrassed to complain about others' upright behavior. (i don't love western countries either)