this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2026
18 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6976 readers
824 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Eton College is better known for princes and prime ministers than iPads but every new boy at the school is now handed one – and much of their work depends on it.

For Isaac’s* 13-year-old son that became a problem after he developed a screen addiction and a psychologist advised him to stay away from online devices. When he asked to hand back the iPad and return to pen and paper, Eton refused.

He was not alone. More than 100 Eton parents backed a letter in 2024 warning of “clear evidence of harm to a significant number of boys in the school’s care due to screen addiction”, we can reveal. The letter, which has not previously been made public, said families who wanted their sons to stop using the school-issued devices had no way to opt out.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh shit, government gonna react now.

UK government bans electronic devices for all children under 16 effective immediately following complaint by one Etonian.

[–] okwithmydecay@leminal.space 5 points 2 weeks ago

Make that one hundred complaints:

He was not alone. More than 100 Eton parents backed a letter in 2024 warning of “clear evidence of harm to a significant number of boys in the school’s care due to screen addiction”

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've worked in IT for private and state schools in the UK and let me tell you: the prats running private schools get away with shit that would land anyone at state schools in prison, so I can't say I'm surprised to hear this about Eton but please don't tar every school with the same brush.

In the private schools I worked at, the process for issuing a device to a student invariably went: "Here's your top-of-the range Apple iThing. Here's a piece of paper with the apps we expect you to install." and that was it - the kids were free to do what they wanted, which is the problem here: not that they have an iPad, but that they have full access to the web browser, App Store, social media, games, etc. Kids were addicted to them from day one for all the reasons we all already know about, but the Fauntleroys who make the decisions in those places just don't want to hear it and will push back on having to make any kind of decision.

State schools were invariably more sensible and when devices were issued - to students, classes, libraries, whatever - they were heavily managed by MDM to make sure that student had exactly what they needed and nothing more: no social media, no games, usually no camera, a website whitelist, a curated list of apps that could only be used based on time of day, geofencing, etc, all controlled by policies customised to each location, yeargroup, curriculum needs, etc. Those kids were less enthralled with the devices specifically because they weren't the target of a never-ending sensory and emotional barrage from predatory billionaires. Where devices were issued to kids on a 1:1 basis for use at home (very rare) they were strictly limited to school-approved tasks unless the parents specifically gave consent (and took responsibility, even rarer); even then there were still strict controls in place and those kids wouldn't be allowed anywhere near TikTok and it's ilk. In this context, tablets, smartphones, laptops, whatever are actually really useful, serve their purpose well and really do benefit the students.

The problem, as ever, isn't the technology, but a lack of consideration and reflection on the part of the decision makers.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

Eton is a public school

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Privileged kids get too much screen time.

Oh the humanity...

[–] Wimopy@feddit.uk 9 points 2 weeks ago

Privileged or not they're still kids who are ending up with mental health problems due to the actions of their school. You can still have empathy for children despite where they happened to be born and what choices their parents made for them.

Not to mention the article is clearly stating this situation is happening outside of Eton with the more general child population with no recourse. Unfortunately, we currently live in a situation where wealthy and influential parents are the ones who can get psychologists and journalists to take note of problems, but that is not the fault of 13 year olds.

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

who gives a fuck about those inbred freaks