The minister of finance clarified that the tax will not apply to sugar free drinks
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
407 points (96.4% liked)
Not The Onion
22381 readers
1625 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
O lol that's fairly recent tho. Yesterday they were all saying: hurr durr the drinking of sweet tasting things should be curbed and I almost punched the narrator via TCP/IP
load more comments
(7 replies)
If you read it, the tax will still apply to drinks with artificial sweetener:
"Gestern war ein Papier aus Klingbeils Ministerium bekannt geworden, demzufolge die geplante Abgabe mehr Produkte betreffen könnte als ursprünglich angenommen. In dem Papier des Finanzministeriums sind zum Beispiel auch Säfte, Milchersatzprodukte wie Hafer- und Mandelmilch und alkoholfreie Biermixgetränke genannt, außerdem Getränke, die lediglich Süßungsmittel enthalten."
If they're really going to tax sugar-free drinks (and not even use the money for healthcare) then it's obviously going to be another tax on being poor, like the increase of the value added tax that they are also planning.
Just what we asked for. Tax increases that are going to do nothing to the overly rich and instead hurt regular people. And then they wonder why people turn to political extremism.
It is a good way to tax the poors while pretending it is ethical and for public health… May the poors would be healthier if they have less money?
load more comments
(4 replies)
They always fumble stuff like this on purpose. A bag of nuts has the worst nutri score ever, a deep frozen pizza is a B.
Lobbyists the answer is lobbyists. The government is very corrupt here, especially the current one.
Nutri scores compare with similar products in a category.
Nuts and pizza are in different categories, and maybe that specific pizza was better than the rest.
"But there isn't even sugar in this!"
"Yeah, but you still suck, so you're paying anyway."
It is not about "sugar-free". It is about added artifical sweeteners. Not that one thinks they would add sugar tax to e.g. sparkling water...
load more comments
(4 replies)
I’m gonna go broke when they introduce the Spicy Tax.
Fuck you and your döner
- Bundestag, probably
Ordering "ohne scharf" because you're weak ❌
Ordering "ohne scharf" because you can't afford it ✅
> Invents Spezi, the best beverage there is
> Invents Shorle, the best beverage type there is
> Taxes the shit out of them
I see what you did here
So if I sell water with the tag sugar free will it get taxed?
The Union really doing their upmost to have the AFD seem more appealing for the uneducated, reactionary conservatives.
view more: next ›