this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
627 points (99.7% liked)

PC Gaming

15252 readers
596 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

More like 'carpet bombed a lot of bridges' repeatedly while condescending all the screaming.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 5 points 2 days ago

Evil corpos purchasing creativity just to see the soul flee.

[–] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

That's right. Can't trust the legacy of Bill "Epstein Island" Gates to be a good company.

[–] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 200 points 4 days ago (11 children)

Basically: The thing everyone worried about and quite frankly knew would happen when Microsoft started buying every studios they could get their hands on... happened.

Embrace. Expand. Extinguish. It never went away. Careless incompetence. The shareholders way.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 171 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Shareholders: "Wow, Microsoft is really expanding by buying up those studios, promising great output for them in the future!". Line goes up.

Microsoft then does nothing except investing all of their money into AI.

Shareholders: "Wow, Microsoft is really streamlining their organisation by dumping all of those useless dead weight studios. Excellent management". Line goes up.

[–] cabbagepatchcrabs@retrolemmy.com 80 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I absolutely hate how on the nose this is. sigh

[–] loppy@fedia.io 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

TIL that this is a valid use of "on the nose" (definition 1). I was genuinely confused, I'm only familar with definition 2 there, "unimaginative; overliteral; lacking nuance; unsophisticated".

[–] Stinkywizzleteats@piefed.social 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

TIL about the second definition

altr

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. I would look at Microsoft's aquisition of studios as those studios exiting the space in the long term. Gaming is thriving but it's not the big studios, it's the myriad of indies and smaller games that are where the innovation and interest is. The monolithic AAA gaming space is in a crisis of it's own making - driven by shareholder demands and the view of games as nothing more than franchises to milk every year.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Im not even sure the extinguish part is intentional here. I think they are just genuinely this incompetent, but Greys Law applies here imo.

Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Microsoft has always been a law firm in a full body silicon merkin.

[–] QueenHawlSera@piefed.social 26 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Why did Microsoft buy all these studios if the plan was to never actually have them make anything?

I've been asking that since they bought Rare and proceeded to do nothing with them.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Embrace, extend, and extinguish

[–] Jako302@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thats something you use to stop competitors before they get big, but MS was never part of the game publisher circle and doesnt't seem to try either.

I agree.

It didn't stop M$ trying the strategy though.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago

Fear of missing out. It is institutionally ingrained into Microsoft when they were publicly burned for "missing out on the internet."

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

It's just like destroying all the health pickups in a multiplayer game so the other team can't heal, I guess.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

For a long time, their value proposition was "use us because what else can you do?" Trying to monololize the gaming industry by buying up whatever good studios they can is just a part of that.

Looking for exclusivity of games to "beat" other companies. As always is their model of "force people to pay us" instead of "make something compelling". Its the Microsoft way.

Because it's run by fucking idiots with MBAs who have no connection whatsoever to the company's profits and losses.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They wanted to own existing IP. Not make new stuff. Buy an asset, milk it, and that'll do. Any words about long-term maybe were lies.

[–] QueenHawlSera@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but what's the point of owning the IP if you're not releasing any new media with it, or even re-releasing the old stuff.

It's not like we get a bunch of HD Collections out of it. Hell Activision's take on Wolfenstein hasn't even been re-released even though with Id and Activision owned by the same company there should be no issues.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reka@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

my best guess is the people who signed off the purchases aren't the same people who evaluate the value of the things they have purchased

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FluidBeef@quokk.au 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Remember when Microsoft bought Rare and did basically nothing with them for two decades?

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not nothing. They remade a bunch of games worse than the originals.

(Some people did enjoy Viva Pinata, but I didn't play that.)

[–] content_educator_94@thelemmy.club 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Viva pinata was absolutely dope

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 67 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They also don't understand software.

[–] pnwpixel@programming.dev 46 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or user privacy.

Or valuing their own workers.

Or how to respectfully be a part of the F/OSS ecosystem.

Or humanity's desire to not live in a pollution stream from their AI processing centers (they're not really "data centers").

Or that we all wish LinkedIn would self-destruct under the weight of its own bullshit, and magically blink itself out of existence.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago

Or consent.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I can't imagine a company founded on its operating system, now deciding vibe coding that flagship product is a good idea... Especially vibe coding literally all of their software products... Dumb as shit.

Also everything they make is now a web browser shell with the app running inside which makes everything slow and memory hungry.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 48 points 3 days ago (9 children)

You have to remember that the only person who ever really wanted Microsoft to get into console gaming was Bill Gates and this was largely an extension of his own love of video games and obsession with getting MS into the living room. Other efforts included things like WebTV, MSNBC, and a device that led to the creation of TiVo. Ballmer cared about Bill’s legacy but once the two of them were gone nobody was left who gave a rat’s ass about Xbox.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

They had vision and knew how to build a brand. The current CEO's idea of branding is to name their products after a tool that absolutely no one will be using.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Yeah, this isn't news and the studio owners who can cash big checks to sell don't care.

[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 22 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I have talked to a mobile game Dev, a very drunker heart to heart. He had an India mobile game (like alto). He made about 120k in 5 years between two versions of the game. And then some tenent adjacent studio offered him 650k for the IP.

In his words "All I could think was that in 650k, my house would be paid. My education loan would be paid and I would still have enough money to ensure my kid goes to college and not worry about an education loan. I knew selling game would mean enshittification of my baby. But then i looked at my actual baby and I knew I had to betray the digital one"

That's the first time I saw it from the dev point of view. He wanted to keep the project, but between choosing fans of his games that can't keep a subreddit alive and doing right by no name, no face fan base vs 650k hard cash from a shitty studio that would concretely secure his family's future. I am not sure if I would hold out.

I know it's not the same with the studio Microsoft bought..... But I can't help but wonder people who sellout might not be such horrible pieces of shit that we imagine them to be.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] krokodil2000@thelemmy.club 29 points 3 days ago (5 children)

MS shot itself in the foot: MS gutted the team, then the game didn't come out right and this resulted in bad sales.

Here are the Steam sales numbers:

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

FYI Doom The Dark Ages was available day 1 on game pass and they were boasting on social media that they had over 3 million players on the first week if I remember right.

It's Microsoft's fault the game didn't sell. Most people (me included) opted to subscribe to game pass for a month instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Wait, there's a new doom game? (Not joking, just noting that I've missed any mention of this whatsoever)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

They also don't understand their customers.

But they do understand what they care about. Short term "Shareholder value"

[–] anewfox@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

anyone who is hopeful about xbox's new leadership probably isn't terribly aware of microsoft's past. they've done this dance a million times. "we're improving!" -> people believe it yet again -> surprise, they found a way to suck even more now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not a single fucking CEO understands art and games. They only thing they understand is profit$. That's all that matters to them.

Of something can't generate a profit, it's essentially useless. Art? If you can sell it at a profit it's good. Or doesn't matter if nobody will ever see it. Oxygen producing trees, sea weed, algae? Not worth a damn until it's cut down, collected, and sold. Food, water, shelter and basic human needs? Gotta make a profit. Don't matter if we can produce tons and people are going hungry, homeless and thirsty, if we can't generate a profit.

Capitalism is a fucking cancer. And these guys are the rogue cells that make it grow.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alzjim@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Microsoft are the EA of yEAsterday

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In the future they will have difficulty recruiting talent for projects and as a result will have to pay people way more like Meta because of the stigma.

load more comments
view more: next ›