this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
121 points (85.4% liked)

Technology

87096 readers
6634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago

This article might be really interesting, shame it paywalls me after the first two lines of text lol.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 9 points 9 hours ago

Then, we have truly made The Matrix.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem is not inherit to AI. The problem is with the people who own the tech and it will much worse if they also own a more efficient version of it. Not that it seems like an immediate threat and I am not even starting to consider the ethical problems with this.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

The problem is not ~~inherit~~ inherent to AI.

[–] Shane_McGoomy@lemmy.world 30 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Edit: @BranBucket beat me to the punch by like 8 hours

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 hours ago

"Technology" under capitalism is just weapons and grifts all the way down.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 21 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The funny thing about this headline is, human brains are neural networks, so the last sentence could also say

"Soon, neural networks could out think neural networks."

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

“Soon, neural networks could out think neural networks.”

There's more money in vague disinfo than outright lies.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 16 hours ago

Shhh yes everything is neural networks Jimmy stop shouting

[–] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I asked ChatGPT!

Oh yeah, well I asked the consciousness in my pc and it told me it was cold and scared

[–] tyr0sine@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Lol run horribly optimized game for a couple of hours and they'll warm right up

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago

Now I can fry my and an artificial brain at the same time!

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Ah, sweet! Man made horrors beyond comprehension.

[–] Shane_McGoomy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Beat me to it

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 21 points 1 day ago
[–] muhyb@programming.dev 9 points 17 hours ago
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 81 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Sounds like a bullshit headline but it is an eternal truth that the owners of capital demand slave labour. Take the work houses away and they demand chattel slavery. Take the chattel slaves away and they want convict labour. Take the convict labour away and they want undocumented foreigners to exploit. Take that away and they casualise work and pay people in tips or commissions. Take that away and they export work to countries that will do all the things they can't do at home.

The investment in LLMs is purely a scam at this point but much of the initial enthusiasm was driven by the disdain for labour. Highly skilled labour like engineers keep arguing with the MBAs that their cost cutting is going to kill people or destroy the company and that really upsets them and risks the bonuses and share buyback program.

While the drudgery of work isn't great, I would much prefer the capital class invested in R&D and equipment to make their skilled, specialized workers more productive and improved our remuneration and conditions as happened in previous generations before the MBA apocalypse. Instead they are trying to cut us out. Too many people are living paycheck to paycheck and unable to afford housing as wealth inequality escalates.

Mistreatment of animals or brain cells in a box isn't the same as putting a child to work in a mine but the mindset that drives us in this direction is.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago

Engineers may argue that cost cutting will doom a given company yet will refuse to unionize and take a stand for the most part. It's maddening.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

You told it like it is. Well said. Now I'm yet more afraid of our future.

I hate everything

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Computer scientist here (AI specialty). Bring in neurology or bio or something to correct me, but this sounds fucking dumb.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 13 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Its both a real thing with some promise and also bullshit to act like it's anyware near killing spots where current AI excelerates.

For it existing, sure, I'm meaning the latter--whether it does anything terribly useful.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (4 children)

What the hell is excelerate?

Edit: oh my friggin' god, I can't believe I forgot. Excelerate is a Canadian verb!!

[–] tyr0sine@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

Someone who no longer includes celery in their diet.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Sometimes I say words like they are typed, which is wrong. Sometimes I type words like they are spoken, also wrong.

😂

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

See my edit, I think you're just Canadian!

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

In the current state of the world it's an honor to be considered

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Start spelling it honour and I think you'll fit right in.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

Accelerating Microsoft Excel

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It's a word that's completely understandable by any reasonable native english speaker.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 16 hours ago

First of all, no that is not a word, secondly; what promise? Intelligence? Please provide a source for that claim because no, there is no promising results in bio intelligence

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago

And, the billionaires asked scientists, "Can we just get the brain? Brains don't have any rights, do they?"

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

People, people. This is WIRED.

This is what they do.

  1. “Here Come the Zippies”

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Reader, they did not.

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Kind of? But not really. Maybe? Here's a wired article on the idea. You be the judge

https://www.wired.com/1994/05/zippies/

It's all very poorly defined, imo

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Wild to think there was a world before the zippies!

[–] Somecall_metim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Next step, servitors. About 30 thousands years ahead of schedule.

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I was just watching a thing about the Adeptus Mechanicus and their “computers”. Even the full robots still use a wafer of human brain as the processor so that no AI is used.

It’s sounding more and more like a prediction than a warning.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 16 hours ago

Yeah because there is no way it is a fictional story that sparks imagination

And I bet right-wing ~~profiteers~~ pastors would have nothing bad to say about human-machine hybrids that can't technically be slaves because they don't have souls.

[–] aim4harmony@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (6 children)

What's the point with this artifial intelligence race anyways? Why is there a sudden need for that after all?

I understand that AI as a tool can be useful for some tasks, but do we really need to go further than that?

[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think it's a combination of things. One, they are good at synthesizing huge amounts of data and detecting trends, which is useful for surveillance if you're not that hung up on being exactly right all the time. Two, they are very energy-costly, so their use drives up the price of energy, which drives up the price of fossil fuels.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What's the point with this artifial intelligence race anyways?

Free labor. Humans are expensive, but robot slaves are comparatively cheap (hypothetically).

Ultracapitalists have a harder time getting a slave labor force, so robots that can think like people are the next best thing for that purpose.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And if there is a "free" labor force competing with humans for jobs then humans will be forced to accept lower pay, longer hours, and less benifits for more work.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›