this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
129 points (91.1% liked)

Technology

87229 readers
4025 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes that would be the joke.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How many more times is Lemmy going to recycle this shitty Futurism ragebait article about a stupid marketing gimmick?

Vote now on your phones/pervert glasses.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Because it's funny

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

My car has driving assistance (my girlfriend)

[–] inari@piefed.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why?

They're not good looking and they're quite expensive for cheap sunglasses.

I could buy 5 pairs of better sunglasses at kmart for the price of these...

[–] inari@piefed.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe because of what it represents

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 5 days ago

Capitalism? The culture war?

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They are capitalizing the hate towards the real pervert glasses

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Probably because they didn't stock very many because it's mostly a joke

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I like this idea, but they are announcing cheapish sunglasses for sale during the height of sunny summer with an estimated ship date of late November. That seems like a slight miscalculation.

EDIT: I'm an idiot, and other places exist. Thank you multiple commenters for pointing out the flaw in my thought here!

[–] warm@kbin.earth 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The entire Southern Hemisphere has gone missing and nobody told me?!

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We already have better sunglasses, we don't need meme glasses.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

It's good for awareness, that's the point. Not to actually make a rival pair of glasses. It advertises DuckDuckGo, privacy in general and brings attention to the problems of glasses with cameras in.

We don't need "smart"-glasses.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Look, as a southern hemispherian, given everything that's going on right now in the northern hemisphere, I'd be pretty fine with going missing TBH.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 2 points 1 week ago

Hopefully they're designed to last more than one season

[–] vinyl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] vinyl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

give it a century and there will be less of it

[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Actually the 'smart glasses' are illegal to use in Europe, as you cannot film people in the street without their consent. It's called privacy and reserve of image.

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Europe is not a country and you can absolutely film in public in most countries that are part of Europe.

[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can film in public but if anyone doesn't want to appear in the recording they can ask to be removed or even go to the authorities. And even if they do not request it and show up in a public display, they can open a case with the authorities.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

You can always ask but you can't demand it. Taking photos of even a single individual without their consent in a public place is perfectly legal in most of Europe. What is not okay is publishing that image though even that isn't automatically illegal. If you're not the focus of the shot but you appear in the background in the crowd then that is okay to publish even if you say no.

[–] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not quite correct. You are not allowed to specifically film people. You are allowed to film in public spaces when the people are just a "background" crowd.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Different countries have different rules. If you film in Germany then you need to blur the faces of people in the background if you want to show that video anywhere.

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago

problem is US congress rats do absolutely nothing for us. vote those bums out