this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
227 points (99.6% liked)

politics

30777 readers
2696 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They ruined the guy's reputation, I hope he takes them to the cleaners

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who views him more negatively now? Every (sane) person I’ve talked to knows he was unfairly targeted. That’s nothing on his reputation.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I don’t think his reputation is ruined. I didn’t even know who this guy was before. I do now and have no negative views about him. I mean his “crime” was riding a bike and picking up some trash.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You may not think that but let's see if a jury of his peers decides that the government did its level best to try, and then decides what is the appropriate compensation.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I’m not saying he shouldn’t sue because he absolutely should. The process was a punishment but his reputation is fine. At least to everyone but the administration.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No no it's reputation is ruined only the release of the Epstein files with pedos names uncensored can clean their reputation.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are we going to ignore the elephant in the room here? The fucking presi6of the US used the force of the Federal government to put this guy in jail. The stress alone is enough for millions in punitive damages.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

He should sue. This story probably reduced his remaining time on earth due to the stress. Sorry I was trying to do a silly joke.

[–] AnalogAllamma@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Of all the people they chose to go after for not doing something they choose this guy who probably has a decent amount of money to retaliate.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

And legitimate claims to libel/slander.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 8 points 1 week ago

Olympian athlets famously swim in money

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This guy was facing prison time and had his name dragged through the mud, all because the toddler in chief's stupid vanity project fell the fuck apart.

I sure hope he has a lot of resources and time to go after Donvict and his apparatchiks. Everyone who got on television and told blatant lies about him should be dragged into court.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ftca, you generally can't sue the government unless they were negligent or malicious. There's no question this was both and I hope he sues Trump personally as well.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It's ironic that all the babies in the conservative movement whine about "lawfare": concocting some kind of alternative reality in which Biden (or Obama's) government was using this so-called "lawfare" against conservatives, LOL.

And they claim this "lawfare" was used against their terrorists that showed up at the Capitol to erect gallows, threaten Congress with violence, smear shit on the wall, beat on cops, etc....all to overturn a free and fair election. They pretend not to comprehend that those people should be considered lucky to spend time in prison vs. getting the treatment they probably deserved, which was being shot on sight while committing their terrorism against the United States.

Meanwhile, they give full-throated support to stuff like this in which an innocent man is made a victim by this administration, and all because baby Donnie is big mad that his vanity project turned into a complete shitshow.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Sue them to oblivion.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

I would like everyone who is slandered by pedo-hitler, if they have the means to do so and don't require the money, to instead sue for "legal fees and a copy of the full, unredacted epstein files"

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

I believe this implies his legal team is busy.

That is a good thing and they have our support.

[–] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Sue Jeanine Pirro for ALL the box wine.