this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2026
66 points (98.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9477 readers
432 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Participation"

Yeah how dare they not participate after getting fired.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

bean-think not a single mention of long covid lol

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

Long covid is woke, and wokeness is a thoughtcrime.

[–] triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 months ago

"outside COVID" no, this is actively propagandizing that it's over.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Economists have spent the past week arguing about why 720,000 people walked away from the labor force in a single month. Laura Ullrich, director of economics at Indeed Hiring Lab and a former Richmond Fed economist, says that rather than treating June’s slide to a 61.5% labor force participation rate—the lowest reading outside the pandemic since 1976—as a story about discouraged workers giving up, it’s actually about supply: There simply aren’t enough workers left to fill the jobs employers have.

“Historically, you’ve been able to look at jobs numbers like what came out on Friday and say, ‘okay, there was a decline in leisure and hospitality. Well, that means there’s less demand for those workers,'” Ullrich told Fortune. “But I think now, and more commonly as we go forward, it actually could be labor supply driving some of that. There are two reasons why you might not add jobs in a month: One is there’s no demand for workers, the other is there is demand, but there’s not enough supply.”

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 months ago

What the fuck is Laura Ullrich smoking?