this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
172 points (97.3% liked)

politics

30301 readers
2311 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

We don't get a choice

As long as what you want is what the economic elites want, it happens.

The correlative factor between what the regular people want and what ends up happening is 0.05. elites are 0.78. business interests are 0.48

If you want to see change become an oligarch, and if not join a business lobbyist group. If you can't do either you're SOL.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

It's not about age, it's about corruption. Old politicians have had more time to make deals, forge alliances, and prove themselves useful to money.

One way to mitigate this is term limits for Congress. Force them out before they can do too much damage, before they can entrench themselves, and gain the support of some billionaire. Less reason to throw millions at a candidate if they'll be gone in eight years.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Not all Republicans are old.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 27 points 3 days ago

Yeah, there are several new generations of fascists ready to take over when the old ones die off, with exactly the same opinions and goals. It is not an age thing, it is a class thing, but oligarch mouthpieces love to spout this particular brand of obfuscation as part of their propaganda, because it seems to be really succesful strategy.

[–] KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

And not all old people are conservative.

This isn't an old person problem; this is an asshole problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 47 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Billionaires are ruining it. Don't let the NYT shift the blame.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (26 children)

The boomers that vote for far right grifters and are happy to pull up the ladder behind themselves certainly deserve a share of the blame too.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (15 children)

Nearly half of boomers have no retirement savings. Blame them all you want, but the problem is the rich. Always has been. Always will be.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fira@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That’s a funny way to spell “sociopathic rich bastards”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (13 children)

They have you focused on old people so you are distracted from the fact that capitalism is the problem

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Does NY Times want to distract us from having class solidarity?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah. It's capitalism and social engineering by the powers that be. That shit is divisive as fuck. The old will be dead soon enough, but that 1% at the top bullshit has gone on for a very long time already. Decades, generations.

[–] decolo@piefed.social 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No war but class war, brother

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] normalentrance@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

Money is, for sure.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

No. Voter apathy, arrogance and virtue signalling transcends age and gender.

It's been ruined for a long time, big money interests has always had a stranglehold on it. That tends to be older people sure but not all of them are beyond 30 either.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Yes.

We need to set limits for the age of our politicians. These people are too old and frail to lead.

One day they’re cheating the stock market with insider trading and the next they’re falling down and getting gravely injured.

Or they disappear into a nursing home because of their advanced dementia, or they just turn the capitol into their nursing home, like Feinstein.

Or they’re taking up space on some panel despite their aggressive cancer diagnosis, only to die and delay government hearings.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›