this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
35 points (92.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

12287 readers
2240 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SOURCE - https://brightwanderer.tumblr.com/post/681806049845608448

Alt-text:
I think a lot about how we as a culture have turned “forever” into the only acceptable definition of success.

Like... if you open a coffee shop and run it for a while and it makes you happy but then stuff gets too expensive and stressful and you want to do something else so you close it, it’s a “failed” business. If you write a book or two, then decide that you don’t actually want to keep doing that, you're a “failed” writer. If you marry someone, and that marriage is good for a while, and then stops working and you get divorced, it’s a “failed” marriage.

The only acceptable “win condition” is “you keep doing that thing forever”. A friendship that lasts for a few years but then its time is done and you move on is considered less valuable or not a “real” friendship. A hobby that you do for a while and then are done with is a “phase” - or, alternatively, a “pity” that you don’t do that thing any more. A fandom is “dying” because people have had a lot of fun with it but are now moving on to other things.

| just think that something can be good, and also end, and that thing was still good. And it’s okay to be sad that it ended, too. But the idea that anything that ends is automatically less than this hypothetical eternal state of success... I don’t think that’s doing us any good at all.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Agree with most of these I guess, but marriage specifically is the one thing that's intended to be forever. Til death do us part and all that jazz.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My wife just moved out after 30 years of marriage, and it sure feels like a failure to me. Maybe some people get to the point where it's not working, and they aren't invested in the marriage so much that walking away is painful. I think most people would say they shouldn't have been married if they weren't that invested in making it work though.

A lot of people have suggested that we should have marriage contracts that have a renewable time limit. Like, "Hey, let's get married for ten years and see how that goes." I could see that being a good thing, but I also think it's fundamentally a different mindset than the traditional expectation of forever.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm sorry to hear about your circumstances.

Me and most of my friend/family group have married in the last few years and I don't know if anyone would have bothered if there wasn't a promise of forever. There's often the desire for a home and kids and it's (in my opinion) hard to do that if you don't have a commitment from your partner. I don't want to raise kids alone or have to do custody arrangements if I can avoid it.

If housing and child rearing were more communal it would maybe be different but I think the commitment is kind of the point.

If you'd be willing to share your experience please feel free to. I didn't have the experience of married parents or even watching them interact/divorce so I'm always on edge regarding the kind of issues I'm possibly missing in my own relationship.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The game Outer Worlds touches upon this concept a bit, although it’s set in a space-capitalist dystopia.

Like a more administrative declaration of vow renewal, in a sense. Can feel a bit cold and could cause a lot of bureaucratic headache however.

I’m sorry for your loss/pain though, on a more serious note.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheBluePillock@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I think it definitely applies to relationships. It does you and any of your partners a disservice to say your relationship was only a success if one of you died.

A person isn't a thing you possess. They have needs that grow and change with them. If those needs ever stop being compatible with the relationship, then the relationship should end. That's not failure. It's wanting the person you love to be happy.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Then I guess you, like me, dislike the concept of marriage. Because the whole point is forever. The forever part is not even what I hold against it though. Some people can and want to be together forever. Feeling forced to be by culture is a bad thing though.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] minnow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The "death do us part" thing is a tradition, but marriage is a legal status. Not everyone is going to follow that tradition, and surely you wouldn't argue this ought to bar them from the legal status

[–] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There’s nothing wrong with forever, but it shouldn’t be some sort of “standard” we hold everything to.

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I would agree if we stopped making marriage the end goal of relationships.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Reminds me of last week when everyone was talking about how Bluesky is worthless because it's just going to go the way of Twitter. And I'm like, Twitter was a good thing for like 15 years.

If Bluesky follows that same pattern, great.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And I’m like, Twitter was a good thing for like 15 years.

See, I was going to say that Twitter was a bad thing for 15 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I feel an adjacent thing about Lemmy — The conversations I most value are ones I used to have on Reddit, but dwindled over the years, as Reddit discourse degraded. Something that's notable is that, on Reddit, the last bastions of meaningful discussion were the little niche subs, indicating that quality of discussion may be inversely correlated with the size of a community.

The federated nature of Lemmy makes it far more resistant to Reddit's fate, but I still feel a sense of inevitability that there is a timer on how long this can last. (Speaking as an aging punk), it reminds me of what happened to Punk: it went mainstream, and thus less punk. Some people have the instinct of gatekeeping a thing to preserve it, but everything needs fresh blood, and some of the people who discover punk via the mainstream are have a heart as punk as anyone I've met — we can't exclude the masses of "normies" without excluding these people too. In the end, I see that punk is probably dead, but the "true punk spirit" is alive and well, having moved into spaces that were less visible to the mainstream. Similarly, I expect that I'll always be able to find online clusters of cool nerds to have meaningful conversations with, because even if Lemmy dies a slow death, they will find (or build) a new space.

Ultimately, the inevitable temporariness of Lemmy (and other platforms like Bluesky) is quite a beautiful thing for me, because it forces me to be more mindful of the moment I'm in, and how, despite the world being shit in many ways, here is something that I am really glad I get to be a part of

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's beautiful.

[–] khapyman@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

Leave it to the Internet to be the best (and worst) of all.

I'm at best a poser punk but the diy ethos always rung true. That said one of my favourite places online is a local old school punk forum. It's niche enough that with its own problems there's still a community.

In my experience that's kind of what an online community needs to be. Not exclusive, but niche enough. I too used to be on Reddit, got there when the great Digg migration happened. Those days it was small enough to have have a community on some subreddits. Gradually it got the point that when I'd read the article or had a reasonable thought about the question there were 11000 replies and anything worthwhile was already said.

These days Lemmy feels kinda similar to the old Reddit. Maybe things stay the same or maybe they change and there'll be another place I log on.

All that said, what OP posted is profound. What you posted is too.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This reminds me of a friend who opened a bakery. The business was successful, and the food was good, but she decided to give it up after a few years when she and her husband started a family.

I don’t consider that a “failure” by any definition. For her, it was a great experience that had run its course.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Yeah. I would usually see a business as failed only if it is going through bankruptcy.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

But she didn't make infinity+1 dollars so what was even the point

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What happened to the bakery? Did she sell it or transfer ownership to someone else?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Isn't this more about things falling apart when the person wanted to continue doing it? If I want to run a shop but it doesn't work financially, then my plan has failed.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I think you're right here: it's all about intent. If someone starts a business, it does well, but then they end it because they want to do something else, is not a failure. If they wanted the business to keep going, but people weren't buying enough of their product to keep the doors open, that's a failure.

You could do the same with any of the examples. It's not a failure if the people are happy to stop or it lasted as long as could reasonably be expected, but if it ends before the people wanted it to, that's a failure. The rocket that lifts its payload to orbit, then shuts off and falls back to earth is a success. But no one says "Well, the rocket ran great halfway to the planned orbit, so even though it and the payload fell back to earth, it was successful."

[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure what you're asking here...

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they end up starting again the same business, then I guess it could be seen that way. But if they just decide to move on without feeling like it was wasted time and try new things, "how long it lasted" shouldn't be the only metric of whether it was a success

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

I feel like with the business example, you could sell it and move on. No matter what happens to the business afterwards, you are fine.

That said I’d agree it depends on the circumstances. Want to keep going but can’t because = failed. Could keep going but decide not to, not failed.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fishsayhelo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

INFINITE GROWTH, BABYYYY WOOOOO WOOOO!!!

[–] t_chalco@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Some things do celebrate the ephemeral, so perhaps there's a cultural need to wrangle these into joy. We beat illness, graduate from school, solve problems, and complete tasks. Adopting such language might help? They've finshed their dream of owning a bakery, lived their goal of being a writer, proudly escaped the clutches of their successful career etc..

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup. And god forbid you start a small business that's successful and decide to pay your employees a good wage and set aside a fair amount of profit for yourself. That's loser talk. You need to go public or sell the business for a giant payout at the expense of your employees, and then you have to keep making more money every year for shareholders, or else they'll consider you a failure and jump ship

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Toldry@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Dan Savage (of the sex and relationship advice podcast "Savage Lovecast") says this frequently.

A short term relationship can also be successful. It doesn't have to end with one of the partners dying in order to be considered good and worthwhile.

[–] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

On Wikipedia, an article for a deceased person reads, “[The deceased] was,” while an article for a TV show that has ended reads, “The Office is”

Feels kinda related in some way

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ApollosCreed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

The best definition of success I heard was from Earl Nightingale -

Success is the progressive realization of a worthwhile goal.

Doing something because you want to do it--and it betters yourself, your family, or your community--makes you successful.

load more comments
view more: next ›