this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
1358 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

12029 readers
2048 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What I find really interesting is that the MAGA type are literally incapable of defending Trump on his own merits, they always resort to some sort of logical fallacy that deflects, distracts, or misinterprets. It implies that they are in some degree aware that Trump is indefensible, but they defend him anyway because they're brain dead and their entire ethos is built around dishonesty.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 1 points 6 days ago

Don't forget the racism. Dishonesty and racism.

[–] Ravenheart@lemmy.zip 19 points 6 days ago

Trump raped babies and Republicans still love him. So....

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Of course liberals are going to be mad, hes just going to rape it.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If Trump raped a baby on live television, live streamed for the entire world to see, MAGAts would still be protecting a pedophile and try to rationalize it.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

And even in the hypothetical, he was trying to molest the baby and he was the one who set the house on fire

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago

Because he would have set the house on fire himself 5 minutes prior

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Trump's first term teemed with moments that Trump did the right thing (they were rare, but, y'know, the broken clock rule) and left-wing pundits would say yeah, it's good that Trump did that.

Then he'd tweet something obnoxious about it. Or when he was thrown off Twitter, would Truth his obnoxious commentary. Sometimes it was about him taking credit, or regretting that he had to do that thing, or walking back is rational statements in favor of irrational ones.

But there were a lot of pundits who believed principle over loyalty, and would give Trump credit when it was due.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Trump's first term teemed with moments that Trump did the right thing (they were rare, but, y'know, the broken clock rule)

I think "teemed with" suggests that it was "overflowing with". Which is like the opposite of "rare".

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

True. I was saying that the pundits teemed with praise for Trump, not that Trump's positive acts teemed themselves.

I could totally have worded it better.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I remember someone saying in the first term that "If he took a shit at the Resolute Desk they'd still defend him."

Then it literally happened. And they did.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If Trump went into a burning building the heat would react with the bronzer and he would be laminated into immobility. Not that there's any chance the coward would be anywhere near the fire.

No, he would kick the shit out of that fire. And then give it $300 billion.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Ben Shapiro starts every other sentence with "let's imagine xyz for the sake of argument..."

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

It's funny

Here in Australia our far right wing pollie had a poster unroll behind her, and our exaggerators now are using the "what if it's a bomb" thing.

And I've been arguing the exact same. It wasn't, no chance of it. Police don't screen for embarrassing posters

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 6 days ago

In the UK after Nigel Farage had a milkshake thrown at him, for the second time, he actually tried to claim that it was a dangerous assault because it could have been acid.

You know because milkshake is well known for transmuting into acid en route, everyone knows that. It's a miracle anyone dares drink it really.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The only reason Trump would save a baby is if he was attracted to it. Which he is.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Indeed and at least the Italian Prime Minister, Meloni, finally had enough of the orange sack of shit. The US giving up to Iran at Versaille, sigh,...stay classy MAGA.

[–] SwissArmyKazoo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

They aren't fake, they are conspiracy theories fuelled by ketamine.

[–] SleepyPie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Yes, if you were a member of a pedophile ring and used your political power to see that no participants were ever even investigated for the crimes, and you saved a baby from a burning house, I would still be mad at you for that first thing.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

One saved baby doesn't undo all the children he raped or the ones he sold to be raped by others.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Actually, I’d shake the guy’s hand and give him a pat on the back for actually saving someone.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I would too but that'll also be the day I fuck Tinkerbell on the back of a unicorn.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don’t think it’ll fit, unless … uh? Poor guy? Lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If Trump was in a building in fire, he would shit himself, waddle out on his widdle stumpy legs, make an unhinged post on truth blaming Obama for migrant fires, shit himself again, and the go eat a McDonald's

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

...and guzzle down a Diet Coke.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

trump would likely molest if its a girl, or sell it to post-epstein clientele or give it to bryan johnson, or peter thiel so they can suck the lifeforce out of the baby.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Always be aware of ricochet and scatter distances.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah I'd still be mad about the pedophilia and dismantling of the constitution and the fascism and corruption.

You wouldn't?!

load more comments
view more: next ›