this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
177 points (94.9% liked)

politics

30158 readers
2201 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 67 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Iran wasn't a ground operation. And so much shorter. And there was no revolution.

Such a weird comparison.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 days ago

Lasts a month costs about half at much of the entire 20 years of the Vietnam war.

In straight monetary values it is probably a bigger loss.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

There are many differences, but the main similarity is the asymmetric warfare that happened in Vietnam and is happening in Iran.

So, while the situation in these wars are different, the reasons for losing the war are similar: because the American military and government don’t understand asymmetric warfare.

[–] 2nd_Fermenter@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

I can't agree enough. Vietnam and Iran employed the same strategy -- bypass the US military and strike the US economy, international position, and resolve. And Iran accomplished in four months what took Vietnam nineteen years.

[–] ji59@hilariouschaos.com 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And there was no revolution.

Exactly.

The people who would care are the same buffoons who only care about gas prices.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, Thats why. He just rolled over after fucking everyone in the country over first.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (6 children)

News outlets like to pretend that cessation of further attacks is failure. We started the war with a Tomahawk missile which killed 168 people, more than 100 school children. Destroyed apartments, hospitals, bridges, water supply. Continuing that shit would have been a success? A victory?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they're saying trump didn't achieve what he wanted. Mainly because he didn't even know what he wanted.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

He wanted what Israel wanted and Netanyahu promised, for Iran to collapse completely.

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 12 points 5 days ago

Probably more like the initiation of attacks was a failure. Me yielding when getting beaten up by a boxer isn't the mistake. Me starting a fight with one in the first place was.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Defeat was inevitable already when the first missile was sent. No matter if USA sent more or didn't. there was no possible winning strategy. All analysts knew this.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago

That's just wrong. The war started with great many missiles and bombs some of which did what you claimed. A single missile can only destroy a single thing. And when you remember how many bombs fell a minor amount of collateral and misstargeting is the usual horror of war.

I mean, America likes to destroy civilizations (a country that has Native genocide as its origin story), it's the anti-civ "civ" after all, so I guess it is an American failure. Now, those now left in power in Iran could still sell off the country to Western oligarchs, which would be a victory for America but that's still seemingly undecided.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You’re presenting a false binary where this MOU and continuing the conflict, as it is, are the only options.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Not really, because he describes an escalation, which is the third option. As in there are 2 ways to continue the war, status quo or escalation, and the alternative to those is the peace agreement.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

There are other peace agreements available. A continued engagement would be more likely to generate them, too.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Holy fuck I've never seen someone so callously support continuing to kill civilians just to get "a better deal" when it took 3 months of killing civilians and life supporting infrastructure to get to this deal.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

So you are saying an infinite number of possible peace agreements equals infinite possibilities?

That's not how this works, peace talks is one option, not infinite.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

(That's the point).

Been saying since the start: Iran is likely in on all this

  • IRGC Coup -- The IRGC has LONG been wanting to make a move over the Ayatollah. Now the new Ayatollah is a sockpuppet and the IRGC has completely taken over by way of coup.

  • Quelled Civil Unrest -- Prior to this conflict, civil unrest in Iran was heavily mounting. Thousands upon thousands out on the street. Now Iranian dissidents hopeful for being rescued were baited out of their homes, only to be slaughtered the first time Trump left them hanging, and the second time Israel and USA suddenly became the new threat and rallied the masses around while also indicating nobody was actually coming to save them from the tyranny within.

  • Superficial Damage -- Most damage done to Iran has largely been superficial for media optics. Even their nuclear program has largely remained intact.

  • New Cashflow -- Not only has this massively benefitted Russia with lifted oil sanctions, the IRGC got a massive injection into their own economy, both with the new toll system but also the literal cited fucking article above.

Meanwhile Trump doesn't give a shit. His goal as a Trojan Orange has been a success.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Look, everyone talks about Vietnam… terrible situation, lots of mistakes by the generals, very sad… but what we did with Iran, let me tell you, it makes Vietnam look like an absolute walk in the park. The incompetent leaders in Washington gave us a total disaster with Iran, frankly the worst failure in the history of our country, maybe ever, believe me!

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

TBF this thing didn't last the better part of a decade and a half and cost hundreds of thousands of American lives. The war on "terror" was a better comparison

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago

This. Isn't. Over. Yet.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

There something wrong with archive. sites or unwall.app?

Just put the article link after unwall.app:

https://unwall.app/foreignpolicy.com/2026/06/16/iran-vietnam-strategy-defeat/

Hm, that seems to still have sign up, but archive.is has whole thing:

https://archive.is/rsAQV

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yes I could do that, and try the many different options until I find one that works.

OR!

OP could provide a link that actually works, so everybody didn't have to hunt for it.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Or you could install the removepaywalls.com browser extension and never have this problem again.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Thanks 👍
That looks way more useful, I've added the plugin to my browser. 😀