this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
7 points (88.9% liked)

News

38619 readers
1906 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By all criteria, this a concentration camp. Not “concentration camp” as rhetorical inflation, or emotionally manipulative shorthand, or edgy metaphor—but as in: literally.

As in: detention without trial, state control, inhumane living conditions, forced labor, dehumanization, brutal violence, isolation from accountability, psychological torture, and—by every available logical extension—murder.

That last one we can’t yet verify in the strict evidentiary sense, but the circumstances suggest it like smoke suggests fire, and they are already trying to hide their actions and deny what is occurring.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

From Wikipedia:

"A concentration camp is a prison or other facility used for the internment of political prisoners or politically targeted demographics, such as members of national or minority ethnic groups, on the grounds of state security, or for exploitation or punishment."

I'd say it tracks.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is not new though, it started with Guantanamo concentration camp for Taliban fighters.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is not new though, it started with Guantanamo concentration camp for Taliban fighters.

It is not new though, it started with 10 concentrations camps during World War 2 for Japanese Americans.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is not new though, it started with Guantanamo concentration camp for Taliban fighters.

It is not new though, it started with 10 concentrations camps during World War 2 for Japanese Americans.

It is not new though, it started with concentration camps for the extermination and removal of the Native Americans

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey! You skipped the civil war concentration camps on both sides, how dare you.

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've always thought it was hypocritical of Americans to be calling Nazis the worst. We literally enslaved a group of people for hundreds of years, bred and slaughtered them at our whim. Had concentration camps, and more. We're not better, and probably worse. We just had good propaganda.

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, I wouldn't say Americans reached the level of industrialized genocide Nazi Germany achieved but we definitely had and still have plenty of blood on our hands.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure I'd agree, though maybe you're correct because it wasn't industrial. We put bounties on bison skulls though to encourage them being slaughtered because we new native populations relied on them, for example. It was brutal and systematic. Sure, we didn't use industrial means to actually kill them, but I don't think that makes it better or worse, only different.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guantanamo Bay is/was its own fresh hell, but it was not a concentration camp.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because it was used for a select few (relatively speaking). It wasn't a camp built to concentrate a sizeable portion of our population into one small area.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

America has been doing this for decades. Look at Guantanamo Bay. We used the excuse of terrorism then and now we're using the excuse of boarder security. As long as people can be controlled by their greed ~~of~~ or fear then this will continue to happen.

Edit: autocorrect...

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Also look at FDRs concentration camps for Japanese Americans. This shit is a time honored tradition in this country.

[–] joel1974@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would you let your daughter date one of these men?

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I know I wouldn't let her date You.

[–] oyo@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Fascist, racist ICE agents illegally abducting people and sending them to concentration camps? Hell no I wouldn't allow her to date one of them.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I didn’t know the criteria for not being placed in a concentration camp was whether or not I’d approve of them dating my hypothetical daughter.

Sorry mate, that rules you out - good luck at CECOT.

[–] Prikkeres@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are they already building ovens?

It is my firm belief that anyone who would do this or approve of this image should be removed from society. There should be some kind of test where these images are shown to a person. If they are not disgusted by them they should be imprisoned for the safety of everyone else for life. Not imprisoned like they would but housed somewhere they can do no harm to anyone.

[–] smokingpistol@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

lol find a better picture, The guys in this picture that you put up are all criminals

[–] beveradb@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you know that with certainty if they never had a trial or any kind of criminal proceedings?

[–] smokingpistol@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

These are not the people in the picture that were sent over by The Trump administration. These fully tattooed from head to toe with gang signs on them are all criminals that deserve to be there. If you are not from El Salvador or live there or been there Your opinion doesn’t matter.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you have a point. we can't defend our institutions by making heroes out of what the public sees as villains. we can, however, say "yeah, most of these guys probably are violent criminals but that doesn't invalidate the rule of law and the right of due process". the former will not help change public opinion, but the latter might.

but i'm a bit of a paradox. i happen to agree with trump's methods. i still see him as a dangerous narcissist, but if i could take that same power and use it to deport evangelicals, capitalist sociopaths, and conservatives, i absolutely would.

it's a war. we just have to win it. by any means necessary.

[–] smokingpistol@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NAH bro free the guys!

But seriously these people are idiotic to use pictures like this where these guys are literal scumbags. If you have a chance watch La Vida Loca documentary on YouTube. They even killed the director that they allowed to film them at the end

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not gonna do that. i don't need to be convinced that cartels and gangs are dangerous and brutal. i wasn't born yesterday.

my question to you is where do you draw the line at who gets due process and who doesn't?

[–] smokingpistol@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is not about due process this is about the picture you guys are using to try to prove your Point. Not one person in El Salvador would Agree to what you are trying to prove by using this picture. Also a majority of these guys in this jail already went through the court process. Look it up, But you’re probably not gonna do that. A lot of of the people in this new jail were already convicted criminals that were In old overcrowded jails that were ran by the gangs. There’s videos of them partying with hookers in the jails Before this one was built. El Salvador didn’t just build a new jail and decide to go find a bunch of people on the street and put them in there.

Also the documentary isn’t for you to pick and choose sides it’s actually a really good documentary

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i never made any assertions about the documentary. i just don't want to watch it.

the way you keep saying 'you guys' is concerning though. are you a conservative?

[–] smokingpistol@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

No I’m an independent voter that has voted Democrat going back to Obama when I was first able to vote, Until this last election

[–] heartbreaker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is this all going so fast, tho? Didn't it take the nazis a few years to get to this point?

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago

The El Salvador facility was already built in 2022 during Pres. Bukele's national crackdown on gang violence. Since it was only running at half capacity (and to ingratiate himself with Trump most likely), Bukele has offered to incarcerate deported gang members there, especially those who were refused by their home countries.

[–] void_turtle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

America already had concentration camps in the form of ICE detention camps and prisons. The trials most faced before being sent to prison do not some how make those prisons not concentration camps. Those also have inhumane living conditions, forced labor, dehumanization, brutal violence, isolation from accountability, psychological torture and murder.

El Salvador is certainly worse, but we didn't get here overnight. The american people have been conditioned to accept this over decades by sending millions of people to internal slave labor camps with the thin excuse of "but they had due process!!!1!"

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By the way, only some concentrations camps in Nazi Germany were exterminations camps. So even without any mass murder this can easily be regarded as equivalent in function to a concentration camp.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

Specifically, extermination camps are industrialized human suffering. Something like an assembly line that builds cars, except the output is death.

All that said, splitting hairs about the definition of this stuff is not a good place to be.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

One thing I noted is that the majority of the people that got deported had tattoos.

Are they intentionally seeking people like that?

[–] Kommeavsted@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

This facility, built under President Nayib Bukele’s “war on gangs,” houses over 40,000 men, most of whom were arrested en masse without any process resembling justice—just tattoos, zip codes, or looking nervous.

Not just American deportees...

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or more interestingly evil...could they be given tattoos forcible to make them look like that?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They would have to be pretty fresh in photos. They take at least 2 weeks to heal

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago

It doesn't have to be real tattoos or even really on them if they can Photoshop them in.

But shaved heads for sure and you can see many of them have a 5 o-clock head shadow, meaning that they don't shave often in real life.