this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
134 points (95.3% liked)

News

38182 readers
1967 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cuba has also discussed plans to use drones to attack US targets such as the naval base at Guantanamo Bay, according to Axios news outlet.

Cuba has acquired more than 300 military drones, according to classified intelligence cited by Axios news outlet.

The report published on Sunday alleges that Cuba had discussed plans to use military drones to attack the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay as well as military vessels and possibly Key West, Florida.

The Trump administration is concerned because of developments in drone warfare and the presence of Iranian military advisers in Havana, Axios cited a senior US official as saying.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cuba has also discussed plans to use drones to attack US targets such as the naval base at Guantanamo Bay, according to Axios news outlet.

Working hard on the propaganda to justify the US invasion of Cuba

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Gotta wag the dog

[–] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 month ago

Seems like blatantly obvious creation of a false pretext considering that we've known for a while the US is thinking of invading.

Axios has become a joke. They've been the admin's lapdog uncritically publishing their claims of negotiations going well with Iran etc. weekly and at the specific times possibly intended to influence the markets. It's become clear it's all just lies they're using Axios to lend credence to...

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow so Florida getting drone-swarmed by shaheds from Cuba was absolutely not on my bingo card this year, but I can absolutely see how we got here.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just take a vacation for one day until those drones are all used up.

Or just ignore it as the propaganda bullshit to manufacture consent for an attack on Cuba it is.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Obvious consent manufactoring is obvious.

They know whats up. Bowing down never works.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Donnie's gonna get his 51st State, one way or the other....

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Cuba should just announce their intention to join the US as the 51st state and watch the administration do an overnight 180 just for shits n giggles lol.

There's no future where the US invades and doesn't just keep it as an occupied territory.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good. They should also have nukes.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A crisis in an important waterway in the middle east is increasing the price of oil, people are talking about going to the moon, the US kidnapped a latin american president and the polio vaccine is on the news. Might as well bring that back too.

They could also bring back Lee Harvey Oswald.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Enough range to reach Maralago?

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I guess the US will learn about drone warfare first hand.

Guess nobody told the goobers in charge that drones are quite small and don't need much infrastructure to be launched (who am I joking, they were probably told but ignored it) and that they are very hard to stop if launched in large enough numbers. You can see that happening with Ukraine and Russia which have the most experience with drone warfare, and they still can't reliably stop them.

[–] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would they buy the actual drones, or the technical sheets on how to builld them? They don't exactly fit under raincoat.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Who says they need to be launched from Cuba?

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

OP, please reconsider posting blatant fascist warmongering propaganda as "news" without any commentary or disclaimer.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I guess they don't run on oil products

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Typical authoritarian crap. The country is falling apart, people starving, no power, but somehow they can afford weapons.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yes. But also know that an unhinged asshole is a few miles north

[–] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

ok do you really have to shit on America like that? we all know things are bad...

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tbf, if you were the leader Poland back in 1939, you would invest everything in defense too, wouldn't you? After all, there won't be a Cuba if Trump invading and annexes them. Trump has also proven to be completely unhinged and unpredictable with his recent invasions so you can't trust any deals made to him. It would be like trusting Hitler not to invade the rest of Czechoslovakia after a deal to give them some of the Czech territory.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Well the problem is they would be facing overwhelming fire power. Seems like a drop in the bucket to me.

But look at all the dictatorships. They all do this. And I guess from all the flack I'm getting here most people think it's great. Buy weapons, not food. Got it.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Typical authoritarian crap. Disparage a democracy for exercising self-defense and ignore the genocidal sanctions against it by implying its issues are all self-made.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

So you're saying that they should waste money on 300 drones which would be pretty useless against a county that spends $1T on weapons? While the power is out? Sure makes sense. Fuck food. We need weapons.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

Iran has shown how useful drones are in self defense against American imperialism. Cuba's problems are not caused by an inability to afford food, but by the USA blockading shipments of fuel (and everything else) to their country. The US is clearly ramping up to attack once their siege sufficiently weakens the country. It would be utter stupidity not to try to prepare.