this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
89 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

83677 readers
4326 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VirtuePacket@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

Cool. Just canceled my sub. Back to Freetube it is.

[–] LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 hours ago

I used to run YouTube Vanced on my phone for years until Google killed it a few years ago. Since I was already paying a monthly sub for YouTube Music (been using that since the Google Play Music days and had my whole iTunes uploaded there) I decided to spend the extra 1-2 bucks a month for the Youtube Music + YouTube Premium combination, since that seemed like less effort than keeping up with ReVanced builds constantly.

Last month I tried getting a student discount for my subscription, but after a day I got an email telling me Google was canceling my sub for an unspecified reason. I decided not to renew it, and instead downloaded ReVanced, and spent a few days redownloading all the albums I only had on streaming, and integrating those along with my old iTunes folder into my Jellyfin I already had set up for movies.

Now I'm saving 15 bucks a month, and have regained full control over my music library. Feels pretty nice, and the Symfonium music app on Android looks 10x better than the ever-changing UIs of YTM ever did.

Also feels great not to give a single cent to an accomplice to Israel's genocidal mania across the middle east anymore. I had already severed ties with Google's mail, photo storage and search a year or two ago. Get fucked Google.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 41 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Okay, fine, I am ready to come out of the closet: I've been a YouTube Premium subscriber for two years. Lynch me if you like. I thought it hypocritical to crucify YouTube and have a Spotify or Netflix or Hulu subscription, and I found the cost acceptable.

Three price increases and a worsening of service later, I cancelled my subscription as soon as I received the email about a price increase.

Incidentally, I think that's the thing to do: you get a price increase, there is no tangible benefit to the increase, you immediately drop the service. None of that "Whatchagonnado?" stuff. The only thing these services react to is an instant drop of revenue. You can live for a month without Spotify (or YouTube Premium), they can't live for a quarter without subscribers.

We always have to remember that the short-term focus of modern capitalism is their weakness: a stupid mistake, a sudden drop in revenue, and the CEOs are flying out the window faster than Putin's generals.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

People don’t know how to vote with wallet anymore.

It’s the reason these services get away with nickel and diming. Look at food delivery. For whatever reason people keep using it even though the fees add up to more than the meal itself. Let alone the markup the restaurant does to cover the costs.

Uber Eats motto should be “For when you want to pay $80 for a $5 meal”

Same thing with like Starbucks. People paying $17 for burnt coffee that needs 45 cups of milk and sugar to salvage.

The services will never change because consumers are lazy. It’s easy to just give their money away. People mock the “stop buying avocado toast” saying. But I think they just misunderstood it. I think the deeper meaning of it was meant to convey to vote with your wallet. You can buy avocados and bread at the grocery store and make an avocado toast yourself for under $1. But instead people go and buy it at a fancy pop-up and pay $18 plus tip for some mustachioed hipster with an artisan apron to make it for them.

/rant

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

My boss claims it has "no effect" to choose where to spend your money.

I remind him, voting with our wallets is literally the only mechanism Capitalism provides for consumer ethics.

It's Prisoner's dilemma. When we think 5m people are going to take the action either way, we don't think our singular efforts matter. But as there are 5m of us taking the action, there are 5m singular efforts that DO matter. If people just don't give up on the idea.

Says the guy who still has an Amazon account :/

[–] manxu@piefed.social 1 points 43 minutes ago

I think the key here is to get used to react immediately, because the immediate reaction causes a reversal of the action. We don't have to live with the increased cost and decreased service forever, because an immediate negative reaction means the service is restored to what it was before, with any luck. So everybody skips a downgrade or price increase at the same time, and until CEOs figure out the trick, it's bye bye enshittification.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

AAA gaming has in fact been suffering its customers voting with their wallets from what I understand.

So there is hope for the greater, more ignorant population at large.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 3 hours ago

The services will never change because consumers are lazy.

That is not true!

The services get more expensive and the quality goes down.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I've never paid a subscription for YouTube. It's been, what, like $10/mo for ten years? Can buy a lot of media drm free for that $1200.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago

You can get a lot for free too if you know what you're doing.

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 31 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 hours ago

Newpipe, grayjay and many others too

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 18 points 6 hours ago

Cool. I stopped paying for it back when it was still called "YouTube Red", during one of their many crackdowns on creators' freedom in the name of benefitting advertisers. I dumped it and installed an adblocker, and eventually YouTube Vanced and its successor Revanced.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 22 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Youtube is also sending notifications about a coachella live stream, even if the notification settings/preferences are turned off.

Even if you have Revanced.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Luckily it has not happened, yet. Either older version or they're rolling it out in waves once again.

But fucking hell, if any app sends me an irrelevant notification without my permission. It loses it's permit to exist on my phone.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean... it's quite literally happened already. I'm not the only one who got the notification so they are definitely doing something. Maybe not with all accounts but 1 is too many.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Sry. It hasn't happened for me yet or anyone near me. So they must be doing it in waves, which is usually done based on location.

I do agree that even 1 is too many, just that it's not as widespread as of now.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago

Ah, got it.

I wonder if its a location thing. I'm in northern Europe, if anyone got the same notification, let me know where you at

[–] boeckling@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Haven't heard about Revanced before. I'm pying for YT Premium but since I use Spotify for music YT Music isn't helping their case if their raising the price.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

According to this reddit thread it also happened to people with Premium https://old.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/1sic32k/getting_coachella_notifications/

Since you haven't heard of Revanced, ignore that and check this one out instead: https://morphe.software/

There was some drama in the Revanced team, a bunch of the devs left and started Morphe. Revanced is on life support right now.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I had not heard of the drama, thanks for the link.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I've sort of skimmed a few posts talking about the drama. I don't have specifics but from what I've read the main guy at Revanced is a bit of a ego and doesn't know how to code (very well). The people who know how to code tried to work with him, got fed up and left.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Reminds me of...a lot of stuff. But especially Retroarch.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no whats going on with retroarch. Please dont tell me that they are having a fight, I just managed to get a bunch of roms downloaded and was ready to start converting my xbox into a retro machine

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It's been a fight the whole dang time. The lead dev is a shite programmer with a gigantic ego and a control freak. He was infamously awful on the emulation subreddit. Deeply disrespectful to the actual emulator devs. MAME team especially have a long lived hatred of Retroarch.

Occasionally he'll rewrite code that was working fine and break something that previously worked. Like...NETCODE. For example. Broke it and refused to take the L. So the guy who wrote the netcode backend quit out of frustration. That's just one of a billion examples.

His ego is rivaled by the likes of stenzek (Duckstation emulator, and front end wizard for Dolphin and PCSX2) the guy behind Simple64, and TeknoParrot. Except those guys are actually good programmers, just insufferable.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm well thats disappointing to hear. Retroarch worked very well on my android device a few years ago. Might be better to check if theres other options to use in the future.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the worst part is it's a very useful program so a lot of people turn a blind eye.

I don't tell people what to use or not. Like I use GrapheneOS but the lead dev crashes out on Xhitter constantly and attacks rival privacy projects.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Like I use GrapheneOS but the lead dev crashes out on Xhitter constantly and attacks rival privacy projects.

Hahah, I subscribed to them on Mastodon, but a few days ago I unsubscribed because he had a weird, multi-post rant against Jolla. I'm not saying he was wrong but it could have been a few sentences long and got the message through. But instead he wrote as if Jolla was a russian demon trying to take over the world. It was rather silly and mildly funny to see but I still don't need that sort of negativity in my feed lol

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

But instead he wrote as if Jolla was a russian demon trying to take over the world

Fucking lol. I guess at least their paranoia works in our favor? sigh...

[–] ropatrick@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yet the FOSS alts are still free. Hot damn.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I would pay a lot for YouTube Premium if it actually blocked all the ads. Unfortunately, it does not. The video itself is allowed to contain ads inside the video, which YouTube does not block. I have heard that if the creator declares it, it can be skipped, but SponsorBlock (aims to) skip all of them by default, and for free.

I have an iPhone — the second worst device for consuming YouTube on, tied with the iPad for the same reason. On my old Android phone, I have Firefox with uBlock Origin. Same with my Macs, and my work PC (which is at work). The worst device for consuming YouTube on, I also own — the Apple TV streaming box (which is ironically the best streaming box due to it not having ads in the OS — I'm dead serious, even if you're Android all the way, you should get one).

On my iPhone, I've deleted the YouTube app. Instead, I have a shortcut to YouTube on my home screen that opens in Safari. I have a Safari plugin called Wipr 2 that I paid $5 for, one time, to a solo developer who uses the Fediverse (Mastodon) and is a woman (this shouldn't matter, but I do enjoy minority representation, and seeing girls win). I occasionally see ads on YouTube, but it's rare, and typically, refreshing Wipr (updating its block lists) fixes the issue.

That's on an iPhone. Wipr2 is not available for tvOS. So mostly, I consume YouTube content on my MacBook, which I can mirror to my TV. Ironically, the TV itself (which runs Android TV) is better at mirroring my MacBook (which is between 1 and 2 metres away) than the Apple TV box, at the same distance. (Make that make sense.) (So, you often hear about Apple and Google being rivals around iOS and Android, respectively, but Apple actually licenses AirPlay to Google for inclusion in Android TV. That is actually a thing, and it works great.) I can also run a Thunderbolt/USB-C to HDMI cable and make my TV a monitor for my MacBook, and just drag a Firefox window up to the TV. But it's a MacBook Air, I still have to keep the lid open, and the screen on (I turn the brightness all the way down though).

[–] Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 1 points 24 minutes ago

Why not get either a DIY Raspberry Pi type media player/server or if you need other streaming subscriptions a licensed Android TV box.

[–] DeadPixel@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Unwatched on iPhone is pretty good, give it a look if you want a native app that isn’t the official one. Although I also vouch for Wipr2 as well. Stumbled on both as recommendations on here over the past 6 or so months.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I used to pay less than the single plan for a family plan, split between 5 people. Back when ad-free YouTube was an afterthought and my primary reason for using it was Google Play Music's unlimited music storage and streaming.

The amount they just increased the cost of YouTube is about how much I'd be willing to pay total for no ads. Until then, they're competing against zero ads (but no casting) for free.