this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
-5 points (44.4% liked)

Soulism

44 readers
1 users here now

Discussion forum for anarcho-antirealism. Read the manifesto at soulism.net

Rules: See MULTIVERSE rules

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

image

That's right, nuttin'! Here's the modlog:

image

This mod clicked ban, saw the box to put in a reason, and put nuttin' in it.

Jokes aside, the last thing I did in that community was say "mods, remove this slop please", in the comments under an AI generated meme, posted by a mod. I thought that was funny, but it might have been why the mod decided to ban Me. But the mod didn't see any reason to put that in the modlog, which is where reasons to ban people go.

EDIT: I was unbanned

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 38 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

you were probably banned for being a prat. you not only complained about the post, but deleted it from your instance. so why are you here bitching about being banned?


image


you also went through the effort of complaining on multiple posts, so that certainly isn't going to ingratiate you with the mods or admins.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 13 points 4 months ago

Those are some pretty interesting receipts.

OP

YDI

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I don't see them complaining on multiple posts.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

then you didn't look. almost every single one of their comments in that comm is them complaining about something regarding the post.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I looked through the first few pages. The most recent comments were on this post, but past that there were comments on other posts, and not about whether those posts were AI slop.

[–] MrNobody@quokk.au 5 points 4 months ago

The OP is a massive troll, they’re in the other thread arguing that “enslaving” ai chatbots is against their vegan belief.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean it's obviously a joke. How are they commenting if it was removed?

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

deleted threads are only deleted for regular users. admins can see and interact with all deleted threads and comments, including those from other instances. as you can see from their modlog, they did in fact delete it from their instance.


image

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

Oh weird I did not realize this.

[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 months ago

YDI.

You weren’t welcome there, seems obvious enough. Not sure why a “anarchist” troll like yourself thinks they deserve an explanation.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 months ago

I feel like people are getting distracted by your dumb opinions but no ban explanation = PTB in my book. It's that simple.

[–] Nima@leminal.space 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

deceptichum is the sole mod for that instance. also, you called slop on a meme that was indeed using AI generated images, but so are a ton of other comments in that thread. so its strange that your comment was the only one removed and you banned.

might just be CLM if he thought you were a bot?

edit: or I guess he isn't the sole mod? i have apparently developed a reading disability lol.

second edit: nevermind! apparently the call was coming from inside the house, if ya get my meaning. (YDI)

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

they're an admin. they deleted the post in question on their instance, and that's probably why they were banned.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why does that merit a ban?

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

they're complaining on every post and deleting the ones they don't like, and you're questioning why that merits a ban. not only that, but they then came to YPTB and lied about being banned for nothing. and you claim to not see the very plainly public constant negative posts they make in that comm, which are clearly listed on their profile. not really sure why you're pulling a Trump fake news over this, but I'm not really interested in finding out. I'm going to just assume you are not being serious and not waste any more time on your nonsense.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The only people that see the deletion are the users on their instance, right? It looks like that's mostly just them. I don't see how this affects anyone else at all.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 4 points 4 months ago

It looks like that’s mostly just them.

yeah, so was their ban. 🤣

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

From reading your replies here and your history, YDI

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 1 points 4 months ago

They are, but so is the mod of that comm so 🤷

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's no rhyme or reason to some of them. I get banned from some subs if I comment too much on the bad spelling or downvote bad spelling.

I think I disagreed with a mod and now I'm a holocaust denier, or something. If mods get to have the last word and we can't refute the libel, then beyond blocking the sub for narcissism I can't be arsed to care more.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Honestly your track record and behavior it's surprising you haven't been banned from more places, or even instance banned completely. Your most recent removed comment is you making fun of a dead 3-year-old. You are legitimately a piece of shit.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago

I don't remember that one. I remember making fun of some parents and the name they choose for kids, but I don't remember making fun of a dead child itself. Did you find someone's straw man? Who says "that's funny she's dead" anyway? That seems excessive.

Sorry I upset you.

Now I wonder what made someone think I'm a h-caust denier. I probably spelled it wrong.