That's right, nuttin'! Here's the modlog:
This mod clicked ban, saw the box to put in a reason, and put nuttin' in it.
Jokes aside, the last thing I did in that community was say "mods, remove this slop please", in the comments under an AI generated meme, posted by a mod. I thought that was funny, but it might have been why the mod decided to ban Me. But the mod didn't see any reason to put that in the modlog, which is where reasons to ban people go.
EDIT: I was unbanned
The posts break our instance rules. Our users signed up to MULTIVERSE because of our anarcho-antireal moderation policies that protect users from authoritarian propaganda. Nobody subscribed to Memes of Production because they want to avoid hearing debate between leftists about proper praxis. Deceptichum is very welcome to make a PTB post, as I have, if they disagree with our instances moderation policies. For My part, I made a PTB post to point out Deceptichum's moderation without policy. Anarchists in a position as community leaders and facilitators don't just do whatever we want, we follow a code of ethics and principles. What you're advocating for is a lack of accountability from community facilitators.
And to answer your question, our perceptions are influenced by our beliefs. Or beliefs, by our culture and communications media. So if the billionaires buy control of mass media (which they have), they can essentially rewrite reality for those susceptible to propaganda (which is everyone). A left realist believes we should still believe in an objective universe, but invest control of our subjective perceptions in the institutions of science. A left antirealist believes that the power is too dangerous for anyone to use wisely, and we should instead wholly do away with the concept of an objective reality, because it's too easy for Capital to use to control us. In other words, realists seek to put authority in people who can be trusted, antirealists seek to destroy the authority structures themselves.
Obviously, you can see the applicability of anarchism to all of this.
you're harassing and trolling the comm, and you have the audacity to complain about self defense in the face of your antagonistic behavior? now you're adding badjacketing to your list of offensive actions.
Openly disagreeing with a post's ethics is not any kind of violent act. That's a duplicitous act of manipulation you're engaging in. I'd appreciate it if we could have a conversation in which you speak honestly.
i'd appreciate it if you stopped being a bootlicking piece of shit. but I don't think either one of us are going to get what we want, because you're a lying little shitlib pretending to be a leftist.
It's unfortunate, I used to have a lot of respect for Grail, but Their recent behavior has been more than concerning lately. It's sad but not surprising, a lot of people who are shitlibs pretend to be leftists and you only find out when they crash out like this.
Grail has always been like this, not a big shock. Always had the weirdest opinions for a leftist.
I don't deny that They've had some weird opinions, although I hadn't seen them acting like this much of a shitlib until very recently.
They defended Biden in 2024, they are a classic shitlib.