this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
100 points (96.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47682 readers
1308 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Samsung is shutting down messages and pushing the use of Google's messenger. Are there alternatives? I don't want to give Google that much personal info to train its AI or to give the regime an avenue to getting my info.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Steve@communick.news 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

There are no real alternatives to Google Messages. There are lots of SMS apps. None of them support RCS, because Google won't let them. So any alternatives will be a downgrade at lest in that regard. Usually a number of others also.

I've used most of the SMS apps out there, none are nearly as nice a Google Messages. It's a shame, but it's true. I've kinda settled on Textra for now, but I'm always looking for something better.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

RCS is just read receipts right? is there anything you're really losing out on?

[–] Grntrenchman@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Internet-routed media transfers, bypassing some (very) shitty filtering done by carriers. Most will compress and downscale any media sent via MMS. A friend didn't have RCS until recently, and I always had to remember to send links and not actual pictures because they would always recieve unreadable garbage if I let the carrier transfer it. But really, ANY other messaging app solves this.. Signal, Telegram, Discord, even Steam Chat will blow the pants off MMS.

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

RCS is pretty much useless for my country which relies heavily on other messaging apps like WhatsApp/Telegram. I use SMS only for OTPs and stuff so I'm happy without any RCS in my life.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

shit, I forgot about the image compression

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I'll get complaints from people they can't add/remove members from a group chat, and it's because I'm in the chat, and use Google voice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] jim_v@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Replied 👍 to "Loved a message"

RCS is encrypted in transit & preserves image & video quality that MMS can lose.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 7 points 1 week ago

There are also no others that have a good web ui, Google Messages web ui is pretty great honestly.

That said, they recently rolled out a requirement to log in to to your google account to use that and I think that might be the line I refuse to cross.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (10 children)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

has signal gone back to sms or am I still expected to somehow evangelize all my contacts into also using it

[–] Steve@communick.news 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you don't evangelize all your contacts into using it, you wouldn't get any benefit from using it for SMS anyway. That's why they removed SMS support, it confused people about the privacy of SMS messages.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The benefit for me was having an sms client that wasn't Google's. Additional privacy with other users that were already onboard with their own volition was a bonus.

[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

You get that using any other SMS app and Signal.
Literally the only gain is having one app instead of two.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago (7 children)

and yet here we are discussing alternative SMS apps, no? One might assume people want an app that can do sms to replace the sms app that is going away

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Literally the only gain is having one app instead of two.

It's also easier to convince others to use signal if there's an added bonus: you're already using it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I wasn't even aware that they removed sms support. It's been ages since I used sms.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was a pretty big bummer. Most people in my circle were using it up until that point. But, you know, the rest of the employed world operates on sms so waddya do

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the rest of the employed world operates on sms

Depends on the country, here almost everyone is in whatsapp. I haven't been able to ditch that because of work and hobby groups.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

oof. my condolences

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I miss the days when signal would do sms. then I didn't need to deal with the rcs bs and could just use signal for everything

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Absolutely, all they needed to do was mark it witj a red flag on the profile pic to highlight insecure messaging.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For an SMS replacement, I've been using Fossify Messages for a while now and don't have any complaints with it. It's open source and doesn't care about your personal info. I don't really use SMS much, so idk if it has all the features you used in the Samsung messenger, but it might be worth trying out.

EDIT: If you need RCS, I don't think there are any open source choices for it, due to how its deployed afaik. You're pretty much stuck with Samsung or Google or some other OEM's SMS app.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

looks like this automatically imports blocked numbers. very good, thank you 👍

also since somebody reminded me of image compression, I'm also getting full images with this

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My phone uses an alternate OS that does not implement RCS at all. I get & send SMS or MMS (multimedia message, i.e. pics, docs etc) to one or several recipients.

So, from my POV, the alternative is just fuck Google and use SMS.

Still, Samsung jumping the gun is worrying for future development.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 9 points 1 week ago

There is Fossify Messages. A caveat. Fossify is a fork of some apps that were abandoned or had the license changed. After that happened, they were unmaintained for a while. That appears to have changed somewhat, but it has been 2 months since the last update on F-Droid.

This is at least the second time they've made me run to another messaging service for no discernible reason, the bastards.

[–] NumerousGeorg@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What I never understood: you have to pay your carrier for SMS services, but RCS is free (just need internet, mobile or wifi) like iMessage is also free? Rght?

[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Free, sure. There is only one app that does it, with huge dependency on Google and/or carrier (whoever runs the servers), which could just... stop working one day, like it did for me.

[–] BruisedMoose@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Google would never just give up on a product that people love!

I know you're joking, but for those who don't know: https://killedbygoogle.com/ and https://gcemetery.co/

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 5 points 1 week ago

Go for Signal Messenger if you want something easy to use and easy to use for others (there's no point changing your texting app if none of your contacts will use it).

Else, there is XMPP and Matrix.

[–] BladeFederation@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Might I suggest a VoIP provider? It costs money, yes, but since you are using your real number on VoIP, you can routinely switch carriers to get new customer deals. For example, I pay $15/month for unlimited data and $5/month to JMP.chat. JMP gives me unlimited text, 2 hours of voice, and voice is less than a cent/min after that is used. I was paying $40/month before for unlimited (still capped after 10 GB). JMP doesn't require personal information (though they will know if you port an outside number and your phone number is public no matter what, so...). You can lie about your name and address to Mint (though I recommend putting a hotel address near you to comply with regional taxes for your payment plan. They'll know your approximate location anyway).

But why would you REALLY do this? Decoupling the phone number you actually use from your SIM card/eSIM is powerful. Everyone who wants to know your phone number can, especially if you live in the US. People search sites are crazy. Even barring that, you give it to the government, job applications, credit card companies, banks, random restaurants, tech companies (even if you are privacy conscious now you probably gave it to Google, Apple, and Microsoft at one point). Your SIM shows your approximate location, which can be legally pulled by the government. Stalkers, PIs, and bounty hunters can and do bribe carriers for this info as well. Unless you have a degoogled phone, your texts are likely being scanned by Google or Apple (look into the way they are blurring nude photos in texts unless your age is verified and asking you if you're sure you want to send or open them).

VoIP protects you from this, and also prevents targeted SIM swaps. You can also get multiple numbers (for JMP it is half price) if you need a work phone number, or for dating new people, restaurants, calling anonymously, etc.

Downsides: Some websites won't accept VoIP numbers. One government website even wouldn't allow me to verify with my number that was previously not VoIP, but was the only number I had used, and therefore the only way to verify.

If you talk on the phone a lot it can get pricey. But you should really be using something like Signal for anyone who you frequently talk to. Traditional voice, SMS, RCS, and even iMessage are all terrible for privacy & security, and should essentially be treated as a public social media post that you can't delete.

If your phone is carrier locked, it is nearly pointless: larger carriers require personal info so you don't gain much anonymity, nor can you save money. If your phone is not degoogled, it is also a lot less useful since Google has your (much more accurate) location data. However, if you don't have a Google account tied to your real name (or don't use one at all) it still may be worth it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 3 points 1 week ago

xmpp account with a jmp.chat phone number?

load more comments
view more: next ›