this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
1004 points (98.7% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26110 readers
62 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 169 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Good thing I don't just eat the stuff by itself right out of the jar and finish the whole thing in a single sitting.

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 69 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Oh god who would do such a thing!?! Next you'd tell me some people would scrape their fingers all around the inside of the jar and lick them making sure they get every last remaining chocolate of that sweet sweet nector of the gods. And even stick their tongue inside, making out style with the jar, making sure no more chocolate taste left 🀀

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 56 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

And even stick their tongue inside, making out style with the jar, making sure no more chocolate taste left

Ladies, are you having trouble getting your man to go down on you? Boyfriends hate this one simple trick!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

Once read a thread where someone was asking the best way to eat it. There were suggestions like on toast, or with banana slices. But the best answerβ€”and the one that had me laughing in tearsβ€”was:
With your whole hand.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 146 points 6 days ago (29 children)

I'm actually not seeing anything especially surprising here. Does anyone eat a bite of it and not immediately know it's got a ton of fat and sugar in it?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 143 points 5 days ago (18 children)

I think the surprising part is that this guy got a jar that was seperated and layered. Mine just comes as one consistant spread.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 71 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They sure tried advertising it as a health food in the USA 20-ish years ago when it was relatively new to the marketβ€”β€œsimple, quality ingredients like hazelnuts, skim milk, and a hint of cocoa.” They were sued for deceptive advertising and had to pay millions of dollars.

But yeah, one bite or a look at the ingredients and nutrition label should be enough to warn anyone. The first ingredient is sugar and more than 50% of the food’s mass comes from added sugar.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (11 children)

It’s amazing that anyone was fooled by this marketing. It shows you the power of it I guess.

The first time I tried Nutella I immediately knew what it was: chocolate hazelnut cake frosting. The fact that people slather it on their toast every day seemed as absurd to me as eating cake frosting every day.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 32 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Knowing it has sugar is one thing. Seeing the volume of sugar relative to the other ingredients is still a shock

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 days ago (14 children)

I guess I've seen so many of these things that I've stopped being surprised. This one was really popular for a long time.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 55 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I am Italian and, living in Scandinavia, apart from being mostly disgusted by the other chocolate spreads, I am always very surprised to see the office managers, offering breakfasts on select days, defaulting to a teaspoon in the Nutella jar.

I grew up with a taboo for that and the only way I would ever have Nutella is by scraping some with a knife-side and spreading it thinly on a slice of bread.

It's funny to see people do such things and then coming with the question: "you Italians have pasta, pizza and Nutella and you still manage to be so thin. How?!"

Check your portions.

[–] impedans@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (12 children)

Yeah as a Norwegian I've always been a bit weirded out when thinking about chocolate spread for more than two seconds. Tbf, I feel like you're making it out to be more normal than it is (but idk how it is in Sweden or Denmark). Among adults I very very rarely see chocolate spread on bread. Among children however... Not great for their nutrition. I think most parents think "better they eat something than nothing" but I'd argue maybe that's not always the case.

On another note: holy crap the regional chocolate spread (nugatti) is like 10 times better than nutella. Nutella households are weird.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 9 points 4 days ago

Can make own at home, with a blender.

Roast your own nuts of choice.

Roasted Almond. Great.

Roasted Almond with roasted Hemp kernels. Great.

Roasted Almonds with roasted Hemp kernels, walnuts, pecans, pistachios, brazil nuts, hazelnuts, with a dash of chocolate, chilli, turmeric and white pepper... Great.

Taking the junk from the corporation... Not so great.

Much more fun exploring what ingredients go in your food, rather than have the corporation choose for you. They don't choose for you. They choose for themselves, at you. You end up with junk instead of food.

Much more fun making your own. Healthier, cost similar, more nutrition, and no where near as much nutrientless white crystalline addictants... unless you want that, and can add sugar back in if you want. (Roasting makes it sweet though. Top tip. Healthy sweet.)

Just almonds, roasted, then blended smooth at a medium speed. Try it. See which wins your taste test.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 30 points 5 days ago

Good to know that there is at least some amount of real cocoa and hazelnuts in there.

[–] Norin@lemmy.world 64 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Food does have ingredients, yes.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (13 children)

Palm oil is bad though. Besides that, I get what you mean

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf 51 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure they mix it up a bit...

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No it's a new food trend, haven't you heard? It's called "deconstructed food", where they just throw the raw ingredients at you and leave it up to you to do the actual work. At the same time they sell it at a premium price brainwashing you into believing this is a new high end dining experience. /j

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vocalize8711@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Why the fuck does it cost that much?!

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 37 points 5 days ago

One of the biggest things about capitalism is that they charge what people are willing to pay in order to maximize profit. Capitalism encourages this behaviour.

[–] bartvbl@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

Because people will evidently pay that much for it. No idea why.

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why the fuck does it cost that much?

most stores have a generic version which is almost identical

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

mine's literally 30% cheaper, every time i think about the purchasing habits of the average person i have to go watch cat videos to stop the red mist from taking over and waking up with bite marks in the furniture

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 5 days ago (13 children)

21 grams of sugar in a 37 gram serving, so >56% sugar by weight

no wonder it's delicious πŸ˜†

[–] petersr@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago (6 children)

European here. Sorry, but it is so ridiculous that labels don't just show some standardized "per 100 g" so things are easily compared without math.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 26 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If you ever baked anything or made desserts this is no surprise. You always have to cut the sugar amount in half.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Are you my mother in law? She does that and her bakes are awful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

I think it's better just to make and eat desserts less frequently than try to mess with the sugar ratios, especially with baking. Like if you want something healthy maybe make a fruit tart instead of something that involves something like Nutella or cake icing where it's supposed to be very sweet.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

why would i eat it less frequently when i can just make it healthier and enjoy it all the time? that makes absolutely no sense to me

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

If it's actually good tasting to you, and everyone who is going to eat it genuinely feels the same, go for it. But like, ever tried eating a rhubarb pie with most or all of the sugar omitted? It is horrible and a waste of food because the bitterness of the rhubarb needs to be balanced by the sugar. You can't just take any recipe and cut out the central ingredient and expect to get palatable results. Making something else instead is the safer option.

Also though, it is worse for you to eat smaller amounts of sugar consistently than a large amount of sugar all at once rarely, the former makes a better environment for bacteria growing on your teeth, and sugar is addictive so making a habit of just having a little on a regular basis will likely result in eating more overall than you otherwise would have.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There's a Turkish supermarket near me and the hazelnut spread there is amazing. It's 50% hazelnut and 10% cocoa with no palm oil

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Is this a surprise to anyone? No one is buying Nutella for the health benefits...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago (18 children)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (14 children)

Strange...My hazelnut spread doesnt contain that...

Just as if Nutella is just cheap shit^(Sadly it costs three times as much for half the volume. But it tastes 10 times better)

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

The sugar content of bakery and candies is high. More news at 6.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί