this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
-14 points (32.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

43052 readers
388 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's perfectly fine to think that you are more intelligent than those around you, you might be right. Generally speaking, though, if it's true you'd shut the fuck up about it and maintain your advantage.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

In other words, real g moves in silence?

[–] elevenbones@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago
[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

But what if I'm 0G?

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Intelligence is multifaceted. You can be highly intelligent in some areas, and not very intelligent in others.

[–] MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world 3 points 4 months ago

And variable. You can be highly intelligent today, but in ten years? A dumbass.

Modern media can turn a person's mind to mush. People who stay sharp are the people who keep reading (books, not memes and comments!), who challenge themselves to learn new useless things, who stay active in mind and body.

I think we've all seen our fair share of people go through this as they age. They find a comfort zone and become programmed by their routine.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’ve got an IQ of ninety-six.

That’s not the real number, or maybe it is. At least, that’s what I tell people how much my IQ is. I haven’t been tested in a long time, and I don’t really want to be. The important thing is, ninety-six is such an absolutely average number, and it’s on the ever-so-slightly low side of average, that it immediately deadens all further IQ-related questioning, and helps explain that IQ is a bullshit concept anyway.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

IQ is a measure of specific kind of intelligence but those terms are not synonymous. ~~Also, 69 is nowhere near average - 100 is.~~

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I think they said ninety six, not sixty nine. And ninety six is close to a hundred. Right?

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Don’t you dare.

Let his artwork stand as a testament to his person.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh indeed. I misread that. Yeah, score of 96 definitely counts as average.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I’m only four percent off of a perfect score! 96 IQ is so strong! I can Einstein a hundred Eulers all day long!

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Thank you for the explanation, that really helps me out. I left my original comment unedited so it can help others too.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[–] markz@suppo.fi 6 points 4 months ago

Well yeah. 11 out of 10 times the people calling themselves more intelligent than most mean that they are just superior. Being unable to shut the fuck about it is also a sign of one aspect of it being lower.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

What? Who frowns on people who think they're above average intelligence? People around here get frowned upon if they are a jerk about it, but not otherwise.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes I'm not sure if I'm the dumbest genius or the smartest idiot.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Kindergarten teacher shows up for the first day of school:

"I'm in the wrong room!"

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -1 points 4 months ago

They aspire to become the least intelligent person in that room.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 1 points 4 months ago

Let's aim for a higher than 50% chance — we have to make the average go up.

[–] TheLunatickle@lemmy.zip -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The more you think you know, the less you understand. It's just how humans function, so if you think you're smart the odds are that you are not.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The more you think you know, the less you understand.

This doesn't quite make sense to me.

That would suggest that my perceived knowledge about plumbing systems is a strong indicator that I don't actually understand them - despite having done it professionally for over a decade.

What I think is true is that someone with a very basic level of knowledge simply doesn't know what they don't know - which explains the strong conviction and lack of nuance, for example. But I don't think that the belief in one's knowledge or abilities alone is an indicator of the opposite being true.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Then ask yourself this: what proportion of people who consider themselves knowledgeable or intelligent do so based on evidence rather than the Dunning-Krueger effect or simple buffoonery? And what proportion of people who actually boast about it have the emotional intelligence to make interacting with them worthwhile? There's a reason this behavior is frowned upon.