this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
116 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30898 readers
2416 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Senate unanimously moved to fund most of the Department of Homeland Security, except for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and part of Customs and Border Protection, in a rare overnight session.

The agreement would fund other DHS components, such as the Transportation Security Administration and US Coast Guard, but the House will still need to act before funded agencies within the department can reopen.

The move is meant to alleviate long lines at airports, while lawmakers continue to debate possible reforms to immigration enforcement by DHS.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wow I’m shocked the Dems held their ground this time. Good job! Gold star today.

Now try not to fuck it up.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It sounds to me like they didn't get nearly what they wanted. None of the restrictions or guardrails on ICE or border patrols were even considered and ICE is already funded for a good long while without this.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I guess at this point my bar is so low I was expecting an ice or border patrol funding anyway.

So I dunno man I just want my hollow victory.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 0 points 4 months ago

Yey! Here's to y'all who like me are poorly informed citizen bystanders! We won! We wanted to win n we won! Yey! We're winners!

Just let me know how hollow? Too much so far? A couple of YMCA dance moves perhaps? A little hurra hoop hoop?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How did they hold their ground? They gave up their only bargaining chip in exchange for absolutely nothing meaningful.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 4 months ago

From what I'm hearing, MAGA is saying that, and they are fucking PISSED. They are in the exact position that Dems were in last Fall when the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries lost that game of chicken that they were easily winning. They knew if they screwed up again, they'd be hanging off a bridge over the Potomac.

Both of those losers still need to go ASAP.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

"unanimously"

The vote was held at 02:20...

Considering the age of the average senator, I really want to see the actual votes and how many were even there.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 4 months ago

house repbulicans blocked it already.

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 4 points 4 months ago

Sweet a manufactured solution to a manufactured crisis from a manufactured solution to a former manufactured crisis

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Let’s see what come out of conference