this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
126 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31316 readers
965 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This post uses a gift link with a view count limit. If it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article

The safety features are worth millions of crashes prevented and thousands of lives saved, making them remarkably cost-effective.

Capping the luxury features and size of passenger vehicles would do a lot more to bring down costs than removing safety features.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 43 points 10 months ago (1 children)

the only life a republican values (other than their own) is that of a fetus, and even that is temporary.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

And only if the fetus ain't miscegenated...

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Profit over people. The Republican mantra.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Darkaga@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Honestly the Canyonaro doesn't even seem that big anymore.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yep, that $2 sensor is really driving up costs.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 10 months ago

And running the wiring with the rear lights wiring is sooooooo expensive to install.

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

If we're talking about the radar+cameras, it's about $30-40 each. Not insignificant, but for basic AEB it's a small price for something that massively reduces collisions

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Capping the luxury features and size of passenger vehicles would do a lot more to bring down costs than removing safety features.

The average cost isn't the problem; the base cost is.

There are good arguments for limiting vehicle size and weight for safety reasons, but that's a separate issue.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

If anyone hasn't figured it out yet, Republicans want everyone who isn't rich to die. We are roaches to them and anything they can do to step on us is a step forward for them.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Compact cars are all in the low $20,000 range, so I don't know what affordability problem they're talking about for vehicles. Oh, that's right, many Americans have an insatiable desire for mobile fortresses that cost $100,000. Well, I'm sure not having ABS or rear cameras on those will turn out well for everyone else and shave off $500.

And I've never been inconvenienced by an alert that I had stuff in the back seat after a trip to the grocery store. It keeps forgetful parents from leaving their kids in hot cars, especially in the aforementioned parking lot tanks.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I basic light truck ran $19k in 19. A sedan, $14k.

Wages haven’t gone up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Buddy my whole car was $500 and I have an insatiable desire to keep it that way. Less components not more across the board please. I don't know what kind of bougie-ass bubble you're living in where a cheap car is $20k, but I sure hope it pops while we've still got a planet

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm talking about new compact car prices, not used car prices, because the article is talking about attempting to bring down new car prices by removing safety features.

Car prices have always been around that much, adjusted for inflation.

Popular car prices over time

[–] londos@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Let R's own making seatbelts optional.

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

OMFG, these things (I can't call them people) are monsters [get rid of rear-seat reminders]!

load more comments
view more: next ›