this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
339 points (98.8% liked)

politics

29705 readers
3231 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jeffrey Epstein once dug into his safe to take out photos of Donald Trump posing with topless girls on his lap, author Michael Wolff revealed on a Thursday episode of Inside Trump’s Head.

Archive Article: https://archive.ph/60hLW#selection-1391.0-1395.1

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 158 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Michael Wolff is a lying sack of s--t and has been proven to be a fraud. He routinely fabricates stories originating from his sick and warped imagination, only possible because he has a severe and debilitating case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has rotted his peanut-sized brain,” Cheung told the Daily Beast

This, ladies and gentlemen, is the answer from the fucking White House communication director when he was asked to comment.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 86 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When I hear this kinda response, it just makes me find the claims more believable.

Like whenever this admin comes out with this kind of rhetoric, it usually means the accusation is true.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah this is definitely something a guilty person wants their press team to say.

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I always skip over Cheung's quotes and I advise you to do the same. He's been performing his shtick for years and has never once added value to anything.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 4 points 7 months ago

Tou spelled "Medvedev" wrong

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I sure hope the Democratic Party starts calling out Murc's Law if they ever get any power back. The Republican Party can do this stuff all the time, but the Tone Police come out to start wagging their fingers at anyone to the left of Goebbels over breaking decorum or some "civility" norms. And while these Tone Police are quite often outright Republicans, the Democrats will go along with them, often joining in.

Sadly, it goes all the way down to the trenches, too. You'll agree with some leftists on 98% of policy, and they'll want to endlessly lecture if they found you used a word or phrase or argument that offends them. This happens mostly online in certain corners of the 'net, but it also happens IRL. I got lectured about having a focus on issues of class is not "intersectional" enough, and by implication, makes me a racist. This kind of thing is exactly how the elites want things to go, by the way. Pointing this out meant I have not ~~done enough struggle sessions~~, excuse me, have not read enough queer/feminist/whatever lit and I need to "check my privilege". None of this hairsplitting and maximalist identity politics is doing any good. It will never lead to the equivalent of an FDR making sweeping changes to help society overall.

I guess my point is I wish liberals would start embracing frank speech, at all levels, and stop worrying about offending people, most especially offending Republicans, "independents" and "centrists".

[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

Exactly. There's no way large scale change can happen in society as long as those who want that change are arguing about the details and are too busy trying no to offend their allies.

Leaders have known for centuries that sowing division is the best way to keep power to themselves.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

But, for much of the source material behind his books, he has tapes. People say things and he quotes them. But those tapes are probably priceless and should be super-backed-up.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 91 points 7 months ago

Jeffry Epsteins best friend, convicted felon Donald J Trump, rapes and murders children.

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 57 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They gotta be children or it’s not really going to matter. The article says “young” but that is not specific.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago

Those pictures wouldn't be in a locked safe...

And as a reminder, Trump's DOJ swallowed up the contents of Epstein's safe into a black hole.

It wasn't just blackmail.on him, it was all fo Epstein's dirt on the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world.

[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

These are Epstein girls, not Hugh Hefner's girls.

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The identities of the girls and the birth dates need to be established for this to be the damning evidence people want it to be.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago

I give it at least 50/50 odds we could have video of donald trump murdering a baby through sodomy and it wouldn’t be “damning evidence”.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You also need to establish the date the photo was taken. I didn’t read the article so I don’t know if they are analog photos with the date printed or if it’s a digital printed photo that doesn’t have the date. Either way, you need both to establish a crime as opposed to creepy but legal.

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The article said very little about the actual photos besides that they existed and that the girls were young. I certainly don’t want to sound like I am in support of Trump, but that is not evidence and it doesn’t say anything.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 points 7 months ago

There's nothing wrong with expecting good quality evidence. Many criminals have gotten away because the evidence was crap or obtained the wrong way.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It is absolutely evidence, but the evidence isn’t conclusive and doesn’t prove anything by itself. If you can get someone to testify that they are in the picture and what date it is, you have a stronger case.

At the very least, if the person in the photo is underage at that time, you can paint a pretty damning picture for the right jury. Furthermore if the person in the photo is underage and testifies to sexual conduct, you have an extremely good case because the fact that there is a picture of them together gives her immense credibility. I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure sexual conduct with a minor has always been sexual assault and illegal so…

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is no evidence. There is testimony about inconclusive evidence. Those photos may or may not exist at all.

Let me give you an example of what this is: I saw a photo of you fucking a child. Is this evidence?

(No, it’s not.)

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That last part wasn’t really necessary.

I was under the impression that the DOJ has the ability to confirm the existence of the photos because they have access to the safe or the contents therein.

Maybe I should have read the article. It’s more speculative than I was led to believe from the comments lol

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 3 points 7 months ago

Considering you did not read the article and were Fighting, admittedly, based on Internet comments… I’d say that last part was going easy on you. What we need less of in this world is people pushing information just because it feels good. That’s how we get so much right wing misinformation…. Let’s not be them.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wolff said Epstein once stepped out of the room during a discussion about Trump and came back holding about a dozen snapshots that resembled Polaroids.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do Polaroids print dates? I was thinking like old point and shoot cameras

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

They do not

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 42 points 7 months ago

Who CARES? We've ALL seen Topless GIRLS!

-Republicans showing up Armed to Drag Shows and making Porn ILLEGAL!

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 7 months ago

More proof comes out every single day that maga loves a pedo.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 24 points 7 months ago

It's almost as if pizzagate was a projection on their part.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

A search for thus story shows it all over - but nowhere on corporate news.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 12 points 7 months ago

Stop talking about what you’ve seen and show the world. Show, don’t tell, or you’ve got nothing.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 11 points 7 months ago

"In the third picture, [trump]’s wearing light pants and there’s a stain on the front of his trousers,” Wolff added. “And the girls—three, four, four or five as I remember—are pointing at the stain and laughing. And that is what I remember.”

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Wolff said Epstein once stepped out of the room during a discussion about Trump and came back holding about a dozen snapshots that resembled Polaroids.

“There were specifically three that I remember—and this is now almost 10 years ago—but the three that I remember are two in which topless young women, and I don’t know the ages of these women, but they are young, are sitting in Trump’s lap. And this is outside Jeffrey Epstein’s house in Palm Beach, around the swimming pool,” he said.

“In the third picture, he’s wearing light pants and there’s a stain on the front of his trousers,” Wolff added. “And the girls—three, four, four or five as I remember—are pointing at the stain and laughing. And that is what I remember.”

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Michael Wolff is not suicidal.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Great, then publish them

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Release the Epstein files and pictures!

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

"... I don't know the ages..."

End of story.