this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

4931 readers
6 users here now

Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyromaiden@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

To play Devil's Advocate nobody has tried to kill Xi Jinping even once; let alone three times.

But then again that just further drives the point home, doesn't it?

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

indeed it does

[–] surjomukhi@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

I think that's the point

[–] gumibo@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

how come the United States would happily try to assassinate someone like Castro 600+ times but not try even once with Xi? Is it because it's too late to change China's trajectory?

[–] Scarry@hexbear.net 0 points 11 months ago

the usa only respects one thing nuke

[–] TrueStalinistPatriot@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
  1. They're incompetent and they can't get to him
  2. While they paint him as the devil the US economy depends on China. Imagine what would happen if any US assassination attempts on Xi were to reach media and China
[–] SoloboiNanook@hexbear.net 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

def main reason lol. the US NEEDS china for the treats. The only thing americans miss about cuba is cigars.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

tbf i don't think the us is trying to kill miguel diaz-canel either. probably has to do with the fact that assassination isn't generally super useful, at least not against established, stable nations

[–] VladimirLimeMint@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The empire is too greedy for even short-term profit, why make someone a martyr when you can martyr and occupy entire country to exploit forever? It was actually one of the reasons Cuba moved on to imprisonment post-revolution, because making your class enemies martyr unite them. Cuban revolutionaries used to just line class enemies against the wall. It was a little disagreement between Fidel and Che on execution because Fidel wanted to spare noncombatant enemies but Che said line them up.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

It was personal with Castro, he played the worst cold war ghouls in washington like a fiddle and won.

[–] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

I imagine that China's security forces makes even Cuba's look like boy scouts.

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

he's the TV guy, he's GOTTA know how bad that looks, which has to mean that he's spooked.

[–] gumibo@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

nah he's victimmaxxing the conservative are into that these days if anything they think "look what precautions they made our president have to do"

[–] VladimirLimeMint@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Same sane country whose population lectures the other one for being authoritarian and dangerous.

[–] KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

The only bad things they know to accuse others of doing is what they see around themselves.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

one is bad, and the other is also bad

[–] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

Yeah, Xi Jinping should have more people praising him.

[–] SigmaStalin@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

革命造反派 ...

Seems like this is from the Cultural Revolution about counter revolutionaries?

[–] SigmaStalin@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

Ye it is about counter revolutionaries alright

[–] TrueStalinistPatriot@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

While Xi and the CPC is somewhat revisionist they're nowhere near close Trump level evil

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There are some revisionist elements in the CPC (I'm wary of Li Qiang for example) but I definitely wouldn't call Xi a revisionist. His installment as General Secretary was more or less an orthodox marxist coup against revisionist Shanghai politicians.

[–] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm also curious where you see that Xi has mostly targeted revisionist Shanghai politicians.

I'm not disagreeing with you, or not entirely, but I feel like you have something specific relating to this.

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

Just read up on Xi's anti-corruption campaign, while it wasn't explicitly an ideological purge it's pretty clear that those that it removed weren't exactly devoted marxists.

[–] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have alot of respect for Li Qiang, and while I understand being wary of officials advocating even for limited market forces, he seems to be one of the more genuine and driven and simultaneously pro-marxist officials in the party.

Is there anything in particular that makes you very wary of him?

[–] MasterDeeLuke@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

He just seems a little more pro-private enterprise then I feel comfortable with. He at least seems competent and I don't think he is an outright revisionist like Gorbachev, but enough to make me skeptical.

[–] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How can you call the CPC revisionist? They are arguably the most orthodox (aside from mainly Cuba and Vietnam) of communist parties.

[–] TrueStalinistPatriot@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Since when does Orthodox Marxism-Leninism mean operating a market economy? Since when does it mean having billionaires? Since when does it mean having private ownership of the means of production? Since when does it mean having the landlord class?

https://www.theredspectre.com/against-dengism

While China is obviously not as bad as the US or European social democracies it neither is a socialist state nor even a dictatorship of the proletariat (capital seeks to control every state it's operating under!) how can you speak of a dictatorship of the working class when the CPC has bourgeois members within it?

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

a wild redditor appears, it's very confused

[–] pinkapple@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

It's so weird that the Trump photo was taken from a position where someone could clearly pop him. Total incompetence.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Whoever took that photo had an angle and shoulda taken it.

[–] lawllo@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

i didnt see it the first time, but now that i look at it again… HOLY SHIT THE OPPORTUNITY WAS RIGHT THERE

[–] lawllo@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

“What? I see no difference here.”

  • Average amerikkkan
[–] amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

The individualist fascist cowering alone vs. the collectivist communist hanging out and having a good time.

[–] Tofutefisk@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

American security culture vs Chinese security culture

[–] ferret@hub.workersofthe.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

But people really hate them and are just begging for a regime change, we promise, let us do a regime change bro

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Also, here's how things are going in the capitalist paradise of occupied Korea https://asiatimes.com/2019/12/75-of-young-want-to-escape-south-korean-hell/

[–] ferret@hub.workersofthe.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ Yeah it's batshit insanity down there even six years later. Westerners glorify it because Kpop dweebs are the modern weeaboo — the RoK has very successfully exported its culture to the west — but people who actually live there, or even pay attention to the politics, know it's a shithole.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago

Now that the US is putting economic pressure on them, things are going to get a lot worse. The regime might actually collapse at this rate.