this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
190 points (84.2% liked)

Technology

89114 readers
4026 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
190
Linus Torvalds posts his first AI-assisted patch to the Linux kernel, synthetic test clocks 23x performance leap — the bossman makes use of AI tooling himself after issuing clear pro-AI directives (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 1 week ago by Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
140 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/linux@programming.dev/p/2509642/linus-torvalds-posts-his-first-ai-assisted-patch-to-the-linux-kernel-synthetic-test-clo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

it shouldn't be that impactful negatively that AI is being used

Doesn't it invalidate the GPL? Open source licenses depend on copyright, and LLM-generated code isn't copyrightable.

(Also, it can't be proven not to contain plagiarised proprietary code, in fact it's quite likely that it does; between this, the testing / review burden, and the mental decay of developers that use LLMs instead of coding, this pretty much kills open source projects, in several different ways to make sure they stay dead...)

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

It's not that they're not copyrightable. That court case is misunderstood. The vibe coder tried to give the AI the copyright and the judge ruled that was stupid because AI can't own shit.

Also copyright doesn't mean much anymore because companies are rewriting open source software as copyrightable vibe coded bullshit the same way people are "open sourcing" Adobe using vibe coded crap.

It's garbage "progress" all the way down.