this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
102 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

70716 readers
336 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm tired of being screwed over so I'm done. So far I have:

  • Installed YouTube music and YouTube via Morphe
  • Installed uBlock Origin, Sponsor Block and YouTube Enhanced on Firefox
  • I've also installed YT-DLP to download videos if I have to.

Yet to do:

  • Work out the best app for my Nvidia Shield Pro 2019
  • Work out if there are any alternatives or way to still use my google nest minis in any way.

Does anyone have any advice or tools to help improve the experience?

Finally I have to add that I do also have a full ARR suite installed and setup on a raspberry pi for but I've always found Lidarr to be the weakest of the bunch. Works a treat for my TV shows and Music

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flapjack@europe.pub 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah Lidarr is just not that good, thanks for the recommendation.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lidarr is also no source but a search engine. If you don't supply it with indexers it's of course "shit".
Same as the eternal issue of bing vs google as a search engine.

Comparing apples and oranges...

[–] flapjack@europe.pub 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hi. I'm not saying it's shit. I know you need an indexer. I just wasn't a huge fan of how it oragnised music and it struggles with discs with multiple artists etc. Maybe I didn't know hoe best to utilise it properly, which is most likely the case.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

It doesnt organize what musicbrainz isnt providing. And it does what musicbrainz does.
The main artist is the sorting artist.
Additional artists are just that. Additions.
If it is an even collab, it's either under 'Various Artists' or on the other artist.

Does it bother me? Yep.
I think how Spotify does it, it's better (listing all artists on the album). But that's now how the industry seems to work ¯\_(ツ)_/¯