this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
416 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

70298 readers
1272 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: AI companies are secretly buying, scanning, and destroying millions of physical books to train their models, permanently locking human knowledge inside private corporate servers. Anna’s Archive is urgently calling on volunteers worldwide to scan and upload books before this cultural heritage disappears forever.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But donate them to whom? The books were one step away from the pulpers when they bought them in the first place, who's going to take them that values them more than that?

Also, these companies are not charities. What do they gain out of all that extra expense?

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also, these companies are not charities

AI companies are filthy rich (at our expense).

They can afford to donate books.

Once again: "capitalism" is not the answer.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In another comment regarding these books, you said:

They can keep both for all I care, tbh.

So it really seems you're just insisting on this because you think it will make things harder for them. You don't care about the books or who they go to in the end.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

First, I can not save everyone, nor would I accept the ridiculous moral imposition you attempt that I should to.

Second, I said they can keep the books and also that nothing (except the invented rules of capitalism) prevents them from not only not doing so but also from donating the books to a party dedicated to preserving them, like an archive. I'm also perfectly aware that just because they could do so, that does not make such a generously receiving party automagically exist. Once again, I can't do all the work. I'd expect someone like them or you would be doing their part, too.