this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
197 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck AI

7825 readers
1322 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You don't use AI in your project? Add your project here or reply to this page: https://noailist.org/add-your-project/
"Made without AI"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Unlearned9545@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The sad irony is that the banning of AI makes the projects more valuable to those training AI.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've been thinking about this problem a lot lately.

We've all heard of Nightshade, which modifies images in a way meant to poison AI scrapers without being perceptible to humans... but doing something similar with code is a LOT harder.

Really curious if anyone else has been working in this space and has any thoughts to share.

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably no way to do something like that and be imperceptible to humans. Could probably find ways to mangle variable names adversarially, but that would also make it harder for humans. The best thing would probably be trying to do reliable bot detection, then serve the bots adversarially constructed text that *looks" plausible, but is nonsense/broken. I've heard about "tar pits" and "markov tarpits;" I don't know if they try to make the content look legitimate and/or adverserially construct the content to try to maximize damage during training.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tar pits are cool, but you can't really put one in front of your codebase when you have it publicly hosted in GitHub or Codeberg or similar.

There are a lot of cool ways you can fuck up code for an LLM and still have it compile just fine... but the problem is that this also makes the codebase a complete nightmare for humans to work on. The real trick is to find a way to make the obfuscation reversible... but in a way that only a human can reverse it. That's the hard problem, and I'm not sure it's solvable.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Markov-chain generated comments?