this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
179 points (87.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

42910 readers
400 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This would stop the currently exponential pace of growth from outpacing what society, and regulation, can adapt to. Thus avoiding the inevitable crash that will happen when we lose control of the exponentially accelerating train of technology, and it flies off the rails.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We need that for wealth as well, ie, wealth caps. Younger too rich? Taxes go up to 100% 9f income until you're below the limit again

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah, this is something ive thought ab9ut too. Something like a tax rate that approaches 100% the more you make/own, so that you reach a pt of diminishing returns. The tax money would need to go elsewhere than the national budget though, so as to not just move the dangerous concentration of wealth elsewhere.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

We need that for wealth as well, ie, wealth caps.

The perpetual struggle of any human-administered system is in how you keep the agents of the system (those implementing the policy) aligned with the principles (those setting the policy). Because we did have high tax rates and nationalization plans and even outright communist manifestos floating around the country eighty years ago. And then they were systematically sabotaged and dismantled by bureaucrats more aligned with the monied interests than the voting public.

In the modern day, you can't even get a ballot amendment passed on majority (even super-majority) vote without a court casually overturning it, a legislature refusing to implement it, or the executive to enforce it.

Even something overwhelmingly popular, like high-speed mass transit or national health care or the policing of pedophile super-predators, is neglected on a bipartisan basis time and time and time again.

Who ~~Watches~~ Taxes the ~~Watchmen~~ Taxmen, so to speak? What kind of social organizing principle gets a large bureaucracy of people committed to redistributing wealth suited up and on the ground to do what must be done?