this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

5537 readers
139 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ladel@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

His reasons for opposing it might be wrong, but what is the point in a state-run crytpocurrency?

[–] Womble@piefed.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Largely to ween ourselves off the dependence of Visa and Mastercard, who are currently skimming off huge amounts of money across the whole world by having a near duopoly on payments. Cryptobros are wrong about a lot of things, and proof of work / proof of stake are both terrible in their own ways, but they aren't wrong about the problems with the traditional payment systems (even if bitcoin et al introduce more and worse flaws).

A digital currency backed by a central bank gets rid of the wasteful mining (the BoE is allowed to just create currency from nothing, that's its job) and provides the regulation that is so badly missing from crypto—which is why it is so scam infested.

[–] matt1126@feddit.uk 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or you could have a publicly owned payment scheme that uses regular money, see debit cards in France (and Germany?)

Or the mobile payment options in Sweden and Norway (and also Denmark maybe?)

You don’t need crypto to fulfill the same function as Visa, Mastercard, Discover, American Express, etc.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

This was only one of several reasons he mentioned.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
  1. It becomes impossible to avoid taxes.
  2. The flow of money through the economy would be easier to trace and examine.
  3. Increasing and decreasing the monetary supply becomes trivial to control inflationary or deflationary pressures.
  4. money laundering becomes difficult, since every transaction can be scrutinized.

The only useful purpose for crypto is as fiat currency. Whether that’s a good idea is another matter, since it would eliminate transaction privacy.

Since governments are becoming more fascistic, I generally think this is a bad idea, since it would give governments more power (to do good or evil).

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

I'm with you. The billionaires will always find a way around this if the transaction record isnt fully public. This hurts fly-by-night cash workers more than anyone