this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1451 readers
6 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Despite rtx 3060

Maybe it's cause I'm not a capital G gamer but I truly, honestly don't feel the need for anything higher than like an rx580, which was the last card I bought almost a decade ago.

99% of the games I play run fine on an igpu in a t480 laptop.

Are there any good games in the last few years that actually need more than a 3060?

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I do pretty much all my gaming on my Steam Deck nowadays, so yeah you really don't need a massive video card.

[–] ChristchurchAsshole@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I play many games on Xbox Series S and the old games run really well (indie games too) but War Thunder and Cities Skylines are choppy, a little blurry and un-detailed. Hitman 3 and games from last year look dreadful, I actually feel cheated lol. That said it looks better on a Series X and those are still cheaper than a PC.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The price of it and driver support (basically no one develops their game for its instructions set) is also a factor that probably got buried by the headline. It's expensive, even at current Vram prices, for what it offers. But I have no doubt that in a year or two they'll suddenly announce a 5090 equivalent for half the price lol.

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p with FSR3 Quality and frame generation averaged 88 fps, compared with 232 fps on an RTX 4060 and 243 fps on Intel's Arc B580.

Jesus Christ gamers can get the wall lmao, 88 fps is more than fine