Ask Lemmygrad

1356 readers

16 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 2 years ago by VictimOfAmerikkka@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JoeDaRedTrooperYT@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you can assist in communal development by hooking into the profit motive of the global economy, that’s okay.

So if I buy stocks from Xiaomi and Apple and use the money to fund unions, that's ok?

[–] ProbablyKaffe@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Implying unions are inherently revolutionary. (Nearly all US unions are already giving money to the stock market to grow their pensions, them for personal benefit, you in this case for communal development geared for NatLib struggles).
Implying unions develop communities outside of creating Imperialist communities in Imperialist states.
Any money you take from the stock market would be accumulating wealth already accumulated by the Bourgeoisie. If you could somehow create a permanent syphon to 3W or 4W resistance groups from the market then that's cool.
Purchase land and give it up to the nations it was stolen from == cool.