this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Vegan

1867 readers
3 users here now

A place for solarpunks working toward a world without speciesism


Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

No, the 'number one' way to help the planet is to not have children, undeniable fact. Diet is number two

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think the assumption is that he's talking about people changing their diets. Can't / probably shouldn't advocate for parents getting rid of their children.

That said, there are probably more direct actions one can take for our ecology that eclipse consumer choices.

[–] starsoaked_lily@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

not parents getting rid of their children; people not having them in the first place

[–] Senal@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago

That's a lot of absolutism for someone not specifying a defining context.

No definition of "help", "the planet" or "diet" means it's wide open to contra-examples.

[–] bequirtle@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I feel like not having kids kinda defeats the purpose of saving the planet

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 0 points 3 weeks ago

Actually, deposing the wealthy is #1, no children #2, and diet #3.

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.org 0 points 3 weeks ago

I've not had 20 kids, so now I get to eat a bunch of animals, and fly a bunch of private jets, and roll coal all day long!

Also, your decision to eat meat in a western country DOES actually cause as much damage as some entire families existence in the poorer countries like Nigeria.