this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
307 points (99.7% liked)

politics

29964 readers
3027 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ungaro claimed that Melania Trump was one of Epstein's escorts, and that is how she was introduced to her husband.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 68 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I mean it gets the point across. She was trafficked by Epstein and pimped out and/or purchased by Trump, probably while she was still a minor.

Tho, don't waste any sympathy on her, she's an evil, rotten sack of shit and fully embraces her role as the modern Ava Braun.

She was a victim of child sex trafficking. Now she's a major perpetrator of the big cover-up and funneling all societal power possible to other child rapists and the Israeli government who perpetrates rape on a mass scale themselves.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh for sure, I don't feel any sympathy for her. I just hate to see articles calling children "escorts" in general.

[–] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

In this case it’s a citation of Amanda Ungaro’s words, not a choice of the author.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, broadly I agree, but in a different situation with a woman not named trump we would probably be a bit more sympathetic and say stuff like "she may have been a victim but that doesn't excuse her actions"

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, I think any woman who's a victim of rape and/or trafficking who then turns around and gleefully supports rapists and traffickers lose any right to sympathy.

Names be damned.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

This is very common among those trafficked, they end up trafficking others for their pimps.

She trafficked in children under "modeling contracts" from Slovenia. She knows exactly what she did.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 days ago

Idk when you call her a purchased person, essentially a slave, you describe a person that would have very limited agency

I'd argue you can't have both here