this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
1318 readers
4 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Eh corruption and nepotism definitely existed in socialist states too and probably always will to some extent, I just think the damage done by corruption pales in comparison to the systemic damage capitalism in general does.
Overfocusing on corruption as one of the biggest problems in society is a liberal narrative because they're incapable of thinking holistically about the entire system.
The difference is that this is actually corruption when it happens in a socialist state and any socialist state which doesn't constantly combat it will eventually succumb to it, whereas "corruption" in a capitalist state is how the system is designed to work, so definitionally not corruption and can be maintained indefinitely.