Officials are easier to replace than infrastructure, unless you manage to whittle the enemy supply of manpower, experience and training capabilities down so far that candidates are similarly scarce.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

On the other hand, the optics of being unable to protect the literal military parade... Might change some Russians' minds about how good and strong of a leader Putin is.

Either one works, really.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then drop something aimed at the will of the people, not the military power. Letters from captured Russian troops to their loved ones, candy for the children, propaganda...

Getting it all past their air defense sends a message to those who care about military strength. The letters may show that you're treating prisoners well (even if they don't all make it to their recipients). The candy... well, happy children are probably the most benevolent kind of psychological warfare.

Collateral civilian damage will be used to galvanise resistance. Hence, violent strikes may end up backfiring (but don't have to - nothing in war is ever quite certain).

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 3 points 5 days ago

So far russians hitting our civilian targets didn't do them much good. I can't imagine the reverse will help us.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I mean, the amount of competence in the Russian military was clearly already low.

I cant imagine how useless any replacements will be.