News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Can someone help me understand once and for all what an "assault style" weapon is? What makes an assault style weapon more deadly than a non assault style weapon?
Nothing. Assault style is nebulous and changes by state. Pistol grip on a rifle is the most common defining to-be banned feature I'd wager. Some bans also target stocks with multiple lengths, threaded barrels, or even 'barrel shrouds' sometimes defined as almost anything touching the barrel of the rifle that allows you to hold it by circumventing the heat of the barrel. Tldr mostly they're banning ergonomics.
Yeah I skimmed the bill. It's nearly identical to the 1992 AWB. We've had a similar law here in MA for years (though it just changed last year) and plenty of people still have AR and AK pattern rifles.
So, "assault rifle" is kind a colloquial term. It's not an actual military category or designation as far as I know. But in a military context the type of gun that people commonly call an assault rifle is a type of light machine gun which shoots what's called an "intermediate round." That's a smaller caliber or lower power rifle round that is spicier and has a longer range than the pistol rounds that sub-machine guns shoot, but which are less spicy and easier to control than the bigger .30 caliber rifle rounds that regular full size machine guns shoot. It sort of splits the difference between two types of weapon to hopefully be more effective in a broader range of circumstances. AR platform rifles like M-16s and M-4s shoot a spiced up .22 caliber rifle round (.223 Remington/5.56 NATO), and AK platform rifles shoot a toned down .30 caliber rifle round with a shortened casing (7.62X39mm aka 7.62 Soviet).
The military version of these rifles are actual fully automatic machine guns, meaning that when on the full auto setting when you pull the trigger they will keep firing bullets until you let off the trigger again. That full-auto capability is pretty much the entire "assault" part of an assault rifle. And it's kind of the difference between military rifles and any other rifle. And even though they look virtually identical, the civilian versions of the same rifles are not capable of doing that. They're just regular semi-automatic rifles, which means they automatically re-cock themselves after each shot so you don't have cycle the gun's action manually, but each shot still requires a separate trigger pull. You can't just spray bullets like an action movie. They work the same as any traditional wooden-stock semi-auto hunting rifle that you'd use for hunting deer or elk.
They're not. In terms of power and effective range they're pretty thoroughly outclassed by your average deer rifle. It's why they're so hard to ban. .223 Remington/5.56 NATO is one of the smallest center-fire rifle cartridges that's commonly available. If you banned every rifle that shot a larger or more powerful round you'd flat-out be banning most rifles, including the one grandpa goes hunting with every year. Since there aren't many legislators who are willing to try to take away PopPop's hunting rifle, most bans focus on cosmetic things like pistol grips or adjustable stocks instead of the actual capability of the gun. It all pretty much just comes down to vibes. Regardless of any evidence, people who have little or no firearms experience tend to just sort of assume "assault" rifles still must somehow be deadlier. Otherwise why would soldiers out fighting a war have the one and not the other, right? Plus, for most people, their entire knowledge of firearms comes from Hollywood movies and police procedurals, which means whatever they know about guns that isn't flat out wrong is probably wildly exaggerated. They've spent their whole lives watching guys on their TV with M-16s take down helicopters and blow up trucks just by shooting at them. On some gut level they feel like there must be some truth to it, and it's very difficult to convince them otherwise when they don't have any first-hand experience.
Muzzle velocity.
Round exits the barrel on an AR-15 at over 3000 feet per second. It contains an enormous amount of energy that obliterates the human body.
And it exits the barrel of an AR15 at the same speed as a .270, or a .243 winchester, or a. 30-06 Springfield, all of which are boring old brown hunting rifles that don't have the scary looking ergonomic attachments.
A 220 Swift from 1935 has a muzzle velocity of 4000fps, even faster than the scary AR!
It's easier to just admit you don't know anything about guns, and neither do the folks writing this legislation.
So why don’t the people who DO know about guns chime in?
All I ever see in these discussions is people talking shit about legislation and why it’s targeting the wrong things. So what should it target? Because I’m sick of mass casualty shootings. Fucking help if you know so much.
I know about guns.
What the US needs is accessible, affordable, quality healthcare including mental healthcare first. Full stop.
Additional financial support should go to remove the stresses of modern life, such as increases in minimum wages and affordable housing.
I will take it a step further. Full funding for this healthcare should come from those who are currently bleeding the US: all of the corporations and billionaires that are currently syphoning the wealth away from the people should pay for the privelege of doing business in the US. They need to be taxed appropriately.
Beyond healthcare (including mental healthcare), other remaining taxed funds can be used to support our crumbling infrastructure and our core support personnel: teachers, healthcare professionals, fire fighters, and (yes) police. However, those dollars shouldnt go freely: no more blanket immunity - erradicate the thin blue line bullshit. If you fuck up as a cop, you should be held to a higher standard.
Fix the mental and physical health of the people. Tax the ridiculously wealthy Restore the middle class
Watch your violent crime rates plummet. THEN start talking about moderate, responsible gun ownership. At least then your population will be more healthy, more well-adjusted, and better primed to have the conversation. You wont get them to the table until you fix their sickness.
What rounds? What grain? There's a . 223 or a classic .308 and they can be hot or not.
You can simply say a bullet is dangerous without sounding ignorant or attempting to sound more educated than you are on firearms.
I linked an article with people who know what they’re talking about. I never pretended to be educated on firearms.
Not true, a bolt action chambered in the same caliber with the same barrel length will be exactly the same muzzle velocity. Muzzle energy is also a more telling stat than velocity. In terms of muzzle energy 5.56 is just an intermediate cartridge, in fact in some states it's actually illegal to hunt deer or larger game with 5.56 because without good shot placement it doesn't kill them humanely enough. Often times bolt actions are also chambered in larger calibers like .308 which are better for large game and also penetrates body armor until you get to the really high-level armor plates. Nothing about the features being banned determines muzzle velocity or energy.
Okay, you tell me: why is a gun clearly designed for killing people so damn good at killing people?
Because its still a rifle round, but the features being banned make no difference in the lethality of the bullet. The article you linked compared the AR to only handguns but no other rifles. Any semi auto 5.56 is as deadly as an AR (if it's chambered in the same caliber) weather it has the banned features or not.