this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
248 points (97.7% liked)

Today I Learned

30609 readers
1119 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
248
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by jaykrown@lemmy.world to c/til@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

How did they let these die? They're so stylish, we should bring them back immediately except with solid state batteries that can let them drive 200+ miles and charge in 5 minutes.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those older cars with the huge windows and great visibility handled rollover accidents by crushing the heads and necks of everyone inside.

At some point we decided the passenger cabin shouldn't be the primary crumple zone, so you can't make cars like that anymore.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Also, it probably has a top speed in the neighborhood of 30mph.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 19 points 2 months ago

The low speed may have been that car's only safety feature.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You wouldn't want to go 30 in that thing. You'd feel like you're in a rock tumbler.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Especially given the state of the roads at the time.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Assuming you've even got a road lol

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I kinda want to see what the wind would look like on this thing going 60 (96.5 km/h). I suspect you'd get more lift than is comfortable. And speaking as someone who's had turbulence in a modern car (interstate driving into an Illinois windstorm), it's terrifying even in a car that doesn't want to roll over.

Edit: seriously thought about it and am more concerned about the moment/torque it might get from the wind

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I own a Wrangler...

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think one of these except more modern with all the advanced necessary features would actually be awesome.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

But we gotta keep the 1920s car design. You csn put a modern battery, and bluetooth, and inputs for auxilery audio devices, and modern stereo syatem, and gps, and all this other stuff......but we gotta keep the old car vibe.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Without the monocoque, I doubt it can pass modern crash safety tests. Nor is there any safe place to install air bags.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

What "monocoque?" That was made so long ago they were still talking about coachwork!

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Nah buddy, 30's design is where it's at, look at this thing:

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, people love to shit on the PT Cruiser but at least it tried to be a little different - arguably in a cool retro way!

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The PT Cruiser looked amazing.

I'd be very happy if more manufacturers took similar style risks.

Buuuut, apparently we get the ~~swasticar~~ cyber truck.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

This is why most cars these days are black, white or grey. "We don't want something someone WANTS to look at, just something that isn't offensive to the eyes" (sports cars don't count here)

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

You could probably make one with a bit of time and effort. People in wild west did.

(Driving it legally in most places would be a different thing.)

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think you can just magically make a battery that goes that long without serious engineering work

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago

If only some serious engineering work had been done in the past 100 years...