this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
339 points (95.0% liked)

Science Memes

20648 readers
1997 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The creative justifications for creationism that try to approach something like science amuse me. Like Kents Hovind and Ham are both too stupid and incurious to be fun; a creationist who’s at least knowledgeable enough to look at “variable c” “”theories”” is entertaining to engage with. That’s part of how I’d justify calling this a “meme” anyway - it’s one of the brighter ones manufacturing a meme to sell to the stupid ones.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I am torn about this situation.

On the one hand, if this community is supposed to be about science (the procedure by which we achieve greater understanding of our world), not philosophy or religion, then does this meme fit here?

While on the other, this community is "A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking", so carry on!🤪

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The conversation around these memes are super therapeutic for those of us raised in fundie households.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

I'm just joking around - part of science is to always continue to ask questions and be skeptical, so this meme definitely is about science 🤣

[–] bobo@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

if this community is supposed to be about science (the procedure by which we achieve greater understanding of our world), not philosophy

Arguably, you can't have science without philosophy. For example you're distinguishing what's science based on the work of 20th century philosophers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verificationism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_rationalism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The thing you have to realize about Ken Ham is: he has an Australian accent.

As a pre-teen in the south, that's practically the Crocodile Hunter.