this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
59 points (96.8% liked)

Fuck AI

6975 readers
212 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
59
Anthropic Mythos shaping up as nothingburger (www.theregister.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/28915274

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/28915273

[...]

That marketing may have outstripped reality. Early reports from Mythos preview users including AWS and Mozilla indicate that while the model is very good and very fast at finding vulnerabilities, and requires less hands-on guidance from security engineers - making it a welcome time-saver for the human teams - it has yet to eclipse human security researchers.

"So far we've found no category or complexity of vulnerability that humans can find that this model can't," Mozilla CTO Bobby Holley said, after revealing that Mythos found 271 vulnerabilities in Firefox 150. Then he added: "We also haven't seen any bugs that couldn't have been found by an elite human researcher." In other words, it's like adding an automated security researcher to your team. Not a zero-day machine that's too dangerous for the world.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

i dunno if im off base here, but staying 1 step ahead in the infinitely escalating digital security war requires using AI

Or just writing new code in Rust, which is much cheaper and prevents a large fraction of bugs

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

While that does mitigate a lot of things, it doesn't fundamentally guarantee security.

For example, the language will not guard against things like SQL injection, path traversal, shell injection, the language itself can't guard against those (however core libraries may discourage dangerous patterns, but ultimately using a library or manually doing something yourself the wrong way.

I would even venture in this day and age most vulnerabilities are no longer from C misadventures. Between popularity of languages that have more safety rails and more analysis tools...

[–] waldfee@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

I do find it funny how Mozilla has created both Rust and Servo, yet FireFox's Gecko is still written in C/++

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Supply chain attacks: exist