this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2794 readers
18 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I myself do not really view "What is to be Done?" as a great beginner work for Marxists, since it mentions a lot of obscure philosophers or groups that a modern audience (with their cursory knowledge of Russian history being from the lips of liberals, or worse, conservatives) would hardly know the context of, and I am reading a version that has notes on these people!

That is not to say that it is not an influential or essential work of Lenin (I think it might be up there with "Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism" and "The State and Revolution" in terms of either factor), but one has to be willing to trudge through Russian names that you will likely never hear again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LeninZedong@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh this is definitely unpopular I think. The thing is that did not some Marxist philosopher (I feel like it was Mao) showed that dialectics is a part of science? Saying it is not necessary to explain the world is just strange to me (do you think that it is also unnecessary to explain politics)?

[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Marx and Engels especially tied dialectics to science. See Dialectics of Nature.

[–] LeninZedong@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh thank you for the resource.

[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago