this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
1351 readers
2 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thank you for sharing and expounding on your giving tradition, it's quite interesting; are any exceptions made for those in poverty?
Well I'm not Jewish, but if I understand correctly, the word "tithe" descends from Jewish tradition of charity. Perhaps one of our Jewish comrads could confirm or deny?
Eta: in Christianity that I've experience with, whether protestant or Catholic, a flat 10% of gross income is expected, donated as you will. If given to a church, the church decides distribution, unless otherwise specified by the donor.
I personally try to give 70% monetarily, and 30% time, although my income after taxes often inverts the formula or dispenses with it altogether (based on material conditions). This formula is specific to myself for my own peculiar reasons.
No problem. If you have any debts to pay, for example a mortgage, rent, etc, than you must pay that first before Khums, though I'm not as sure about Zakat but I assume most Marja would apply the same ruling.
After looking it up from Sistani, the most widely followed Shia Marja, he essentially says, If the amount you have to pay after debts goes below a minimum threshold then Zikat is not obligatory.
Some links to Sistani on the general ruling of Zakat:
Q&A Zakat
Distribution of Zakat
Most excellent replies, comrade, I look forward to reading these after evening chores! Thanks so much, again!
Fitra: I'm not sure I grasp the full comprehension of this word as given by search results, the best seems to be here: https://blog.quranmajeed.com/what-is-fitra-and-fidya-in-islam/ I admit I am regrettably ignorant, so the fault is probably my own.
I think I have a vague but good enough understanding of Zakat.
From a cursory reading of your and my links here, it does seem that if a person can not meet both debt and sustainable living expenses, you are correct about a very poor person being released from Zakat.
It would seem almsgiving from every religious perspective is supposed to prioritize the individuals over the institution, if it's not possible to give to both.
For anyone with a faith position, whether you take it literally or not: how do you approach donated necessities of life (food, shelter, clothing, refrigeration, a way to cook, heat, cool, clean self and dwelling) that aren't actually needed or usable by you? I tend to pass then along to the next person or donation outlet, which seems more desirable than letting it spoil or go to ruin if not perishables. Do you feel this is correct? Not that it absolves me from any portion of my own obligations, of course.
Fitra, basically is just derived from fitr which means "fasting". If I'm remembering right, in regards to zakat, it's essentially something somebody does if they can't make up their fast for Ramadan for whatever reason. Instead of redoing your fast at a later day/partaking in the fast in general (usually due to health) the way to make up that fast is to give to charity.
For my family, we usually just try to use spoilables whenever we can but give them to other family members or the Mosque when we have a surplus. For things like clothing, I'm not as in tuned as I'm not one to buy ew clothing much unless I need to. For unneeded ones we usually give them to thrift stores, good will, donation, or to someone we know who needs them.
It just seems like the natural thing to do in my opinion, so I've never really ascribed a moral or objective position to it. So I guess by that metric I'd call it "correct" but that's from just my subjective perspective rather an a detailed analysis of practice.
Look at that, a Muslim and Christian whose values largely align rather neatly, 🫂