this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1353 readers
3 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Asking because I haven't heard much about it that comes from reliable sources (actually reliable sources, not what Wikipedia defines as a reliable source).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

My problem with any religion is hypocrisy, othering, suggesting that gender identity, skin color, enslavement, physical, sexual, psychological abuse etc. is divinely ordained. I don't particularly even care that it's belief in fairy tales. Placebo meds work wonders, and so does the ability to gaslight ourselves, to an extent.

As for my own religious identification, it doesn't even matter if the deity is real, the overall message is good, and I can relate it back to actual Jewish teachings to better understand it and it changes my current understanding and interpretation and it's very different to what I daresay most of us have been taught (although I have serious disagreement with parts of Judaism and understand it is rewritten ancient Sumerian religion). I'm really into Jewish and Christian mysticism, and it's changed my life and mental health for the better. I'm also ok with most religions within the parameters I've set forth. And finally, to borrow a quote from a liberal journalist, whose father was a protestant minister, "religion makes a good man good and a bad man bad."

I've known Muslim people who are really great people and some that were hateful and evil. The same as Christians, Hindus, Jews, Buddhists, Taoists (exception of those adhering to I Guan Tao), Gnostics, Satanists (excepting Laveyan), and atheists.

[–] LeninZedong@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are the exceptions you mentioned examples of good or bad religious sects?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 2 months ago

In my experience, undesirable.

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Laveyan Satanism is a massive individualist hellhole and when one of your guiding theorists is Ayn Rand, that immediately positions a given belief as less then worthless.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was he Randian? As I got older, I said Laveyan Satanism was selfish AF and seemed very Randian.

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 months ago

Very much so, in a lot of LaVeyan's early writings he explitcly outlines Nietzsche and Rand as being his two largest inspirations.