this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4957 readers
18 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

It might be an uneven law that needed review but for now at least, isn't this change aligned with Citizens United in the US and hasn't that had some famous consequences we are kind of living through? I'm not arguing the law should be unevenly applied, just that for now there seems to be risk

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 4 days ago

Oh I want them to introduce campaign funding limits, just without the loop holes and unfair advantages.

They won't though, because it wouldn't benefit them.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The major parties had exemptions before this law was struck down, meaning they were already exposed to unlimited and undisclosed donations from billionaires.

This ruling will force the majority Labor government to introduce legislation without the loophole.

Allan said the ruling meant state politics could be flooded with “dark money” from foreign billionaires, and she promised to introduce legislation to restore the electoral integrity regime within the limits of the ruling.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 0 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I get that. It seems to me that it's relying on parties in power doing things that limit their power so I was just saying it seems risky