1
Victoria left without limits on political donations after high court rules laws unconstitutional
(www.theguardian.com)
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
It might be an uneven law that needed review but for now at least, isn't this change aligned with Citizens United in the US and hasn't that had some famous consequences we are kind of living through? I'm not arguing the law should be unevenly applied, just that for now there seems to be risk
Oh I want them to introduce campaign funding limits, just without the loop holes and unfair advantages.
They won't though, because it wouldn't benefit them.
The major parties had exemptions before this law was struck down, meaning they were already exposed to unlimited and undisclosed donations from billionaires.
This ruling will force the majority Labor government to introduce legislation without the loophole.
Yeah, I get that. It seems to me that it's relying on parties in power doing things that limit their power so I was just saying it seems risky