this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
440 points (99.8% liked)

News

37093 readers
2598 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A U.S. appeals court on Friday declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, calling it an unnecessary and improper means for ​Congress to exercise its power to tax.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of ‌Appeals in New Orleans ruled in favor of the nonprofit Hobby Distillers Association and four of its 1,300 members.

They argued that people should be free to distill spirits at home, whether as ​a hobby or for personal consumption including, in one instance, to create ​an apple-pie-vodka recipe.

The ban was part of a law passed during ⁠Reconstruction in July 1868, in part to thwart liquor tax evasion, and subjected violators ​to up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The problem wasn't the individual blowing themselves up, it's the individual starting a massive fire that spreads to surrounding structures. That's less of a problem with modern fire suppression and building materials, though, so what made sense 158 years ago probably isn't as big of a concern.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt even the risk of fire will a problem since modern home distillers will use small electric stills. And the alcohol boils of at about 170F, (about 76C for our challenged brethren in Texas). So the explosion risk is also very minimal.

The challenge is to maintain a steady temperature while distilling your booze. Just enough heat to drive off the alcohol while leaving the majority of water behind.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

since modern home distillers will use small electric stills.

Acting like most of the people doing this aren't the biggest rednecks on the planet... Meth labs don't need to be dangerous either, and yet... (not comparing alcohol to meth before the angry replies come).

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

When you can go on amazon and buy an 8 gallon electric still you plug in to the wall for under $200, there ain't much sense in redneck engineering a still.

It's kind of like brewing beer, you could floor malt your barley, but ain't nobody doing that at home.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What about BBQs? You've got people, often drinking, handling things like propane canisters and burning charcoal while cooking objects that emit flammable oils in dry grass or right next to their home. It's a recipe for disaster.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As I mentioned elsewhere, the problem is that there'd be a civil war if you tried to stop people from burning shit. There's a compromise being made between public safety and the public's appetite for regulatory restrictions.

But also, like I said, fire is less of a problem with modern fire suppression and building materials. I wonder if those propane grills would actually be legal if our cities were still built like they were 158 years ago. I also wonder if they'll remain legal forever, or if increasing droughts and infrastructure decay will force bans in some cities.

[–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm talking about people in this thread commenting like this reversal is going to cause massive fires tomorrow.

But to your point, the ban was never about safety, it was about tax collection.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It could definitely cause a massive fire someday. Some home brewer blows up in California during a drought and suddenly you've got another wildfire in an urban area.

... but it probably was about taxes. The US doesn't give a shit about public safety.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't see people complaining about houses in the US using flammable and dangerous natural gas for tons of things, including drying clothes for chrissake. You know, a process that occurs by itself if you just leave the clothes in the air for a bit.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Didn't I already say it? The US doesn’t give a shit about public safety.

I'd be in favor of banning gas stoves and clothes dryers, but that would probably cause a civil war.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That and home made hooch can sometimes make people go blind if they do it wrong and there's too much (I wanna say?) methanol in the batch.

[–] eyes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thats actually a myth, it's basically nothing in sugar and grain based mashes and can be mitigated easily with fruit mashes. It's one of those things that's been perpetuated through scaremongering, almost all cases have been purposeful methanol consumption or adulteration - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_methanol_poisoning_incidents

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The very first incident I clicked on makes it look like it's definitely an issue. Under Mexico on the site you linked-

Government restrictions on liquor and beer sales during the COVID-19 pandemic may have exacerbated the problem of illegal production and sale of alcoholic beverages in Mexico. Reportedly, 35 people died in 2020 in just one mass poisoning incident due to methanol tainted drinks

[–] eyes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Looking into those incidents further most of those appear to be cases where the alcohol was adulterated with methanol rather than as a result of distillation.

That occurred because the US government poisoned the supply of alcohol during prohibition.