this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
937 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

11592 readers
2380 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

if it is necessary the industry behind it should not be allowed to profit and should be run and owned by the working public.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Alternatively what if it does profit but all the profit goes towards public good? I.e. into the communal balance.

[–] stray@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you mean letting public goods be run with a profit incentive for the purpose of increasing efficiency or such, I think what you'll find every time is that the service shifts focus to the median user and disregards fringe cases like users with disabilities, remote areas, etc. I would also expect material quality to degrade as those with cheaper up-front costs would be valued over expensive durable ones.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

no i meant more in the sense of: instead of the company not being allowed to profit, they can profit but 50% of the profit goes into the communal balance.

it would be easier to implement that because all you have to do is to order that 50% of the company shares go towards the city/municipality.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that’s not the kind of profit of which i spoke. but ok!

yeah it would be easier to integrate into our existing legal system